主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2018 ›› Issue (1): 6-11.

• 鉴定制度 • 上一篇    下一篇

司法鉴定过程的法律规制研究——以“其他类”司法鉴定为视角

刘克毅   

  1. 西北政法大学
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-14 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-01-15
  • 作者简介:刘克毅(1968-),男,副编审,主要从事诉讼法编辑和教学工作。

Study on Legal Regulation of Judicial Expertise from the Perspective of OthersForensic Expertise

  • Received:2017-02-14 Published:2018-01-15 Online:2018-01-15

摘要: 摘要:“其他类”司法鉴定与法医、物证、声像等类型的司法鉴定有明显的不同,鉴定过程中的许多事项,例如鉴定用途的合法性,鉴定标准的选择,鉴定材料真实性、完整性以及取得方式合法性的判断等等,都是与价值评判密切相关的法律问题。采取不同的法律规制方式,让法官、当事人有效地参与“其他类”司法鉴定的鉴定过程,以法官的审判权和当事人的诉权制衡鉴定人的鉴定权,可以提高鉴定意见的可靠性、科学性和可接受性,有效地减少补充鉴定、重新鉴定的出现,节约鉴定成本、提高鉴定效益,进而促进纠纷公正、便捷地解决。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 其他类司法鉴定, 司法鉴定过程

Abstract:

Abstract: “Others” forensic expertise is significantly different from the types of forensic medicine, forensic physical evidence and forensic audio/video in many aspects, such as the legitimacy of the use of appraisal, the choice of appraisal standards, authenticity and completeness of appraisal materials, as well as the determination of the legitimacy of obtaining the materials, etc., which are legal issues closely related to value judgment. We should take different regulations towards the categories, let judges, the parties effectively participate in the “other type” forensic appraisal process, so that the judges’ authority to hear a case and the parties’ litigation right can balance against the right of the appraisers,and may improve the objectiveness,reliability, acceptability of the appraisal opinions,effectively reduce supplementary appraisal or  re-appraisal. In this way, the cost of appraisal can be reduced and the efficiency improved,thus promoting the fair and quick resolution of disputes.

Key words: forensic expertise, other type of forensic expertise, forensic expertise process

中图分类号: