主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2013 ›› Issue (4): 17-22.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

论我国专家辅助人制度及其完善 #br#

王桂玥1，2，张海东2   

  1. 1.吉林师范大学，吉林 四平 136000； 2.中国政法大学 证据科学教育部重点实验室，北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2013-04-23 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2022-07-11
  • 通讯作者: 张海东（1969-），男，副教授，副主任法医师，主要从事法医学教学，科研及鉴定工作。
  • 作者简介:王桂玥（1981-），女，讲师，博士研究生，主要从事证据法学和司法鉴定制度研究。E-mail：wgy0228@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省四平市社会科学基金项目（201137）

On the Expert Assistant System and the Improvement thereof

WANG Gui-yue1，2, ZHANG Hai-dong2   

  1. 1. Jilin Normal University, Jilin 136000, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Evidence Science ,China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2013-04-23 Published:2013-07-15 Online:2022-07-11

PDF

摘要：

随着2012年修订的《刑事诉讼法》的施行，我国全面确立了专家辅助人制度。专家辅助人制度可以提高当事人质证的有效性，促进法庭实质审查鉴定意见的准确性。但是，我国专家辅助人制度存在着中立性无法确保、作用范围有限等缺陷。为了正确发挥专家辅助人制度的功能，我国应采取一系列措施进一步完善专家辅助人制度，例如明确专家辅助人的首要职责，建立专家辅助人库，强化鉴定中立性原则，确立利益冲突原则等。

关键词: 专家辅助人, 质证有效性, 中立性, 利益冲突原则

Abstract:

With the implementation of the amended Criminal Procedure Law in 2012, China has established the expert assistant system. This system can improve the effectiveness of the litigants’ cross-examination and urge the court to review the accuracy of expert opinions. However, there are some defects in the expert assistant system, such as the lack of measures to ensure the neutrality of the expert assistants, and the limited scope of function. In order to give full scope to this system, we should take some measures to improve it, such as making clear the experts’ primary responsibility, setting up database of expert assistants, strengthening the principle of neutrality of appraisal, establishing the principle of conflict of interests.

Key words: expert assistant, effectiveness of cross-examination, neutrality, principle of conflict of interest

中图分类号: