主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2012 ›› Issue (2): 37-47.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

交通伤后遗智力缺损或精神障碍伤残评定资质问题探讨

汤 涛,张钦廷,管 唯   

  1. 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所 上海市法医学重点实验室,上海 200063
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-09 出版日期:2012-03-15 发布日期:2022-07-12
  • 作者简介:汤涛(1966—),男,主任法医师,主要从事司法精神病鉴定研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(81001354)

The Qualification for Disability Assessment of Intellective Defects

TANG Tao, ZHANG Qin-ting, GUAN Wei   

  1. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai 200063, China
  • Received:2011-05-09 Published:2012-03-15 Online:2022-07-12

摘要:

近年来,交通伤后遗智力缺损或精神障碍伤残评定日益增多,实际评残操作不规范,造成鉴定意见不一致经常发生,影响鉴定质量和交通事故处理。当前,部分鉴定机构及其鉴定人的资质问题已经受到交通事故处理机关的质疑,也引起司法鉴定管理部门的关注。对此,就精神伤残评定资质问题从程序规定角度和技术操作层面展开讨论,力图为精神伤残评定的规范操作提供一些思路。

关键词: 司法精神医学, 法医学, 精神伤残, 脑损伤, 道路交通事故, 评定

Abstract:

In recent years, there arise more and more disability assessments of intellective defects and mental disorders caused by traffic accidents. As a result of non-standard operations in the practice, the inconsistence of assessment conclusions occurs frequently, which harms the assessment quality and affects disputes resolution regarding traffic accident compensation. So far, the qualification of some assessment bodies and their examiners has been questioned by traffic management departments, and has also drawn the attention of forensic identification administration sectors. With the aim to provide some ideas on the operational standardization of mental disability assessment, this article discusses the topic associated with the qualification for mental disability assessment from two aspects: procedures and technical operations.

Key words: forensic psychiatry, forensic medicine, mental disability, brain injury, road traffic accident, assessment

中图分类号: