主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2012 ›› Issue (4): 86-99.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

试论如何正确应用DNA证据

梁权赠1,田野2,石美森1   

  1. 1.中国政法大学证据科学研究院，北京100088； 2.四川大学华西基础医学与法医学院，四川 成都610111
  • 收稿日期:2011-11-10 出版日期:2012-07-15 发布日期:2022-07-18
  • 通讯作者: 石美森(1978 -)，女，副教授，主要从事法医物证学研究。
  • 作者简介:梁权赠(1987-)，男，硕士研究生，主要从事证据法学研究。 E-mail: quanzeng913@163.com。
  • 基金资助:

    教育部新世纪优秀人才项目(NCET-10-0773)；北京 市科技新星计划项目(2010B073)

Discussion on the Correct Application of DNA Evidence

LIANG Quan-zeng, TIAN Ye, SHI Mei-sen   

  1. 1. College of Evidence Science, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China;2. College of Basic and Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610111, China
  • Received:2011-11-10 Published:2012-07-15 Online:2022-07-18

PDF

被引次数

3

摘要：

拟构建一套正确应用DNA证据的逻辑框架，以避免DNA证据被错误解读和运用，明确法庭科学家和法庭审判 者在DNA证据应用中的权责界限，保障事实认定之准确性和司法审判之公正性&提出了以概率统计学为工具，实现从 “匹配”到“来源”之逻辑转化的必要性、合理性以及初步构想，并对当下主要的DNA证据解释方法予以分类和评价。

关键词: DNA证据, 逻辑推理, 概率统计

Abstract:

A logical chain for applying DNA evidence correctly is constructed in order to prevent DNA evidence from being misinterpreted and wrongly used, to distinguishing the rights and responsibilities clearly between forensic scientists and judges, as well as to guarantee the accuracy of fact -finding and the fairness of judicial adjudication. By means of probability and statistics, the necessity and rationality of transforming “evidence matches the accused（ to ）the accused is the source of evidence （are suggested, and a preliminary idea to achieve this logic transformation is put forward. In addition, the major DNA evidence interpretation methods in China are classified and evaluated.

Key words: DNA evidence, logical reasoning, probability and statistics

中图分类号: