主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2012 ›› Issue (6): 13-18.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

论司法鉴定管理领域的治理范式

郭 华   

  1. 中央财经大学 法学院，北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-06 出版日期:2012-11-15 发布日期:2022-07-19
  • 作者简介:郭华（1963—），男，副教授，博士，硕士研究生导师，主要从事诉讼法学、司法鉴定研究。
  • 基金资助:

    司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目（09SFB2026）

Power Struggle in the Field of Judicial Appraisal Management and Governance Patterns

GUO Hua   

  1. Law School of the Central University of Finance and Economics， Beijing 100081， China
  • Received:2012-07-06 Published:2012-11-15 Online:2022-07-19

PDF

摘要：

司法鉴定体制改革过程中因侦查机关对司法鉴定管理权的抵制以及审判机关对司法鉴定管理权的干扰，使得涉及此领域中的不同权力之间出现纷争，以至于法律确定的统一司法鉴定管理体制历经七年之久仍未形成。其主要治理对策为：侦查机关的鉴定机构与实施侦查部门实施分离，与社会鉴定机构平等地接受司法行政部门的统一管理，并借助于反对解释的力量限制侦查权力钳制司法鉴定管理权的弹性空间；在制度上，立法应果断地回应审判机关对司法鉴定管理权的侵蚀，保障司法鉴定管理权能够依法有效地运行，使司法鉴定体制改革走出困境。

关键词: 司法鉴定管理权, 侦查机关, 审判机关, 治理方式

Abstract:

Disputes emerge among different powers in judicial appraisal during the process of  judicial appraisal reform， due to the investigation organs’ resistance to and the courts’ interference with the right of judicial appraisal， so that the legally-established uniform judicial appraisal management system has not yet formed for five years. The main countermeasures are： the appraisal organizations of the investigation organs are separated from the investigation departments and administrated equally under the unified management with social appraisal organizations， and are limited the flexibility to control judicial appraisal by means of the force against interpretation. From the perspective of the system， the legislation should respond to the courts’ attitude towards judicial appraisal， to safeguard the efficient operation of judicial appraisal， and to make the judicial appraisal system out of the predicament.

Key words: judicial apprapsal management right, investigation organ, trial organ, governance pattern

中图分类号: