主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2011 ›› Issue (1): 7-12.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

论司法鉴定体制建立的依据及进一步改革的重点

顾永忠   

  1. 中国政法大学 诉讼法学研究院,北京100088
  • 收稿日期:2010-10-11 出版日期:2011-01-15 发布日期:2022-07-22
  • 作者简介:顾永忠,(1956-)男,教授,博士研究生导师。

The Basis for Establishment of the Forensic Appraisal System and the Focus on Reform Thereof

GU Yong-zhong   

  1. China University of Political Science and Law, Research Institute of Litigation, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2010-10-11 Published:2011-01-15 Online:2022-07-22

摘要:

《决定》施行已经5年。总体上应当肯定,但也有值得总结和检讨之处。除保留了侦查机关所属的鉴定机构外,《决定》基本上关闭了国有资本进入司法鉴定领域的大门,这是值得研究的。建立什么样的司法鉴定体制应当有四方面的依据:司法鉴定机构的本质属性;不同诉讼活动的特点;不同国家的国情;成熟国家的经验教训。以此考察我国现行司法鉴定的体制,应当建立由国家出资的公立性鉴定机构,其与侦查机关所属的鉴定机构以及社会鉴定机构一并构成我国司法鉴定三支队伍,各有分工或侧重,共同担负起我国司法鉴定的任务。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 体制, 依据, 重点

Abstract:

The “Decision” has already been implemented for five years. Generally speaking, its effect is positive, but there still exists some inadequateness. The “Decision” almost closes the door for government capital to enter the forensic appraisal field, except for keeping the forensic appraisal institutions affiliated to investigation organs. This needs to be reviewed. To establish a forensic appraisal system, there are four aspects to be considered: the essential nature of the forensic appraisal institutions, features of various litigation activities, situations of different countries, and experience and lessons of the developed countries. Looking from these aspects, we should include forensic appraisal institutions established and funded by the government in our forensic appraisal system. Such institutions, as well as forensic appraisal institutions affiliated to investigation organs and social forensic appraisal institutions, with their own assignments and particular emphasis, will jointly take on the responsibility of forensic appraisal in our country.

Key words: forensic appraisal, system, basis, focus  ,

中图分类号: