主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2011 ›› Issue (3): 21-25.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

论我国司法鉴定质证程序的困境与出路

赵长江１，２   

  1. 1.重庆邮电大学 法学院，重庆 400065； 2.西南政法大学 法学院，重庆 400031
  • 收稿日期:2010-11-03 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2022-07-26
  • 作者简介:赵长江（1980—），男，讲师，博士生，主要从事诉讼法学研究。

On the Problems and Solutions of the Cross-examination Procedure of Forensic Appraisal

ZHAO Chang-jiang   

  1. 1. Institute of Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications， Chongqing 400065， China； 2. Institute of law， Southwest university Political Science， Chongqing 400031 China
  • Received:2010-11-03 Published:2011-05-15 Online:2022-07-26

PDF

被引次数

30

摘要：

我国司法鉴定质证程序自《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》颁布后并没有显著改变，鉴定人不出庭和对鉴定意见质证流于形式的问题仍然存在。究其原因，从宏观上看是诉讼制度的问题，从微观上看是鉴定意见质证本身的缺陷。解决这一问题，在宏观上应当在诉讼程序中建立和完善证据开示制度、交叉询问制度；在微观上应建立异议和关键鉴定意见强制出庭制度，明确不出庭的后果，规范质证规则和内容，并建立专家辅助人制度。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 鉴定意见, 质证

Abstract:

No remarkable changes have taken place in cross-examination of forensic appraisal since the implementation of the “Decision on the Administration of Forensic Appraisal”. The problems still remain where appraisers do not appear in court and the cross-examination is merely a formality. From a macroscopic view， it is a problem of the procedure system； from a microscopic view， it arises from the defects of the cross-examination system. To resolve these problems， the system of discovery and cross-examination should be built in the litigation procedure. The compulsory appearance with clear unfavorable consequences against challenged for key appraisal opinions， the rules of cross-examination， and the expert assistant system should also be established in law.

Key words: forensic appraisal, appraisal opinion, cross-examination

中图分类号: