主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2011 ›› Issue (5): 70-73.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

知识产权诉讼中的鉴定人制度探析

赵 平   

  1. 西南政法大学,重庆 400031
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-02 出版日期:2011-09-15 发布日期:2022-07-28
  • 作者简介:赵平(1986-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事知识产权法研究。

Research on the Appraiser System in Intellectual Property Litigation

ZHAO Ping   

  1. Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 400031, China
  • Received:2011-03-02 Published:2011-09-15 Online:2022-07-28

摘要: 知识产权诉讼中的鉴定人应定位成类似于专家证人的法官辅助人。其资质的认定应以鉴定权主义为原则,鉴定人主义为例外。当事人和法院均对鉴定人有选任权,但法院对当事人所选定的不合资质的鉴定人有否决权。其权利义务除遵循我国相关法律法规外,宜吸纳英美法系某些关于专家证人的义务规定。其鉴定意见须经法庭质证,由法官对鉴定意见的可采性做出判断。其责任追究应采用过错原则,错鉴责任的过错须是主观故意或重大过失。

关键词: 鉴定人, 专家证人, 知识产权鉴定, 知识产权诉讼

Abstract: An appraiser in intellectual property litigation should be defined as judge assistant similar to expert witness. On his qualification authorization, “the appraisal right doctrine” should be the principle, whereas “the appraiser doctrine” is the exception. Both the litigants and court have the right to choose appraiser, however, the court can reject an unqualified appraiser chosen by litigants. The regulations about rights and duties of appraisers can be borrowed from the related rules on expert witness in Anglo-American law system, besides abiding by the current laws in our country. The appraiser conclusion should be verified through cross-examination, and the judge determines whether it can be adopted. The accountability system of appraiser should be established under the fault liability principle, and only when the appraiser has intentional misconduct or gross negligence can he be responsible for his wrong appraisal. 

Key words: Appraiser, Expert Witness, Intellectual Property Appraisal, Intellectual Property Litigation

中图分类号: