主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2011 ›› Issue (6): 81-82.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

某商贸大厦地基基础工程质量司法鉴定的案例介绍

吕松江   

  1. 广东泰安建筑工程质量司法鉴定所,广东 东莞 523071
  • 收稿日期:2011-05-09 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2022-08-01
  • 作者简介:吕松江(1962-),男,高级工程师,国家一级注册结构工程师,主要从事建筑工程设计、监理、咨询和鉴定工作。

Case Report: Foundation Quality Evaluation of a Commercial Building Project 

LV Song-jiang   

  1. Guangdong Taian Forensic Evaluation Station of Construction Quality, Dongguan 523071, China)
  • Received:2011-05-09 Published:2011-11-15 Online:2022-08-01

摘要: 通过对某大厦地基基础工程质量的司法鉴定,发现其中存在严重的质量安全隐患,为法院提供了具有高度公信力的证据,为诉讼多年的疑案划上句号做出了应有的贡献,揭露了被告偷工减料、野蛮施工的丑恶行为,保障了受害者的合法权益,有力地维护司法公正,促进社会和谐稳定。建筑工程质量司法鉴定涉及着控辩双方较大的利害关系,鉴定资料和鉴定文书的庭审质证过程必然充满着对抗情绪,司法鉴定人更加需要在本职工作中坚持科学、严谨、客观、公正的基本原则。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 建筑工程, 质量事故

Abstract: In a forensic evaluation case of the foundation quality of a commercial building, we found that there were serious quality and safety problems, exposing the facts that the defendant cut corners and performed barbaric construction. Our report provided the court with highly credible legal evidence, leading the proceedings to its end after years of mystery. Through the scientific investigation, we made our efforts in protecting the legal rights and interests of the victims, defending the fairness of justice and promoting the social harmony and stability. The forensic evaluation of construction quality involves great economic interest of both sides. The cross-examination process of the identification report and documents in the court is inevitably filled with confrontation. For this reason, the forensic experts need to adhere to the basic principles of scientificity, rigorousness, objectiveness and justice.

Key words: forensic identification, construction, quality incident

中图分类号: