主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2023 ›› Issue (1): 1-11.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2023.01.001

• 专题研讨：司法鉴定立法 •    下一篇

健全统一司法鉴定管理体制之协同化建设路径——兼与单一立法路径说商榷

张保生1，2，贠 丹3，陈邦达1，4，等   

  1. 1.中国政法大学 证据科学教育部重点实验室 司法文明协同创新中心，北京 100088；2.最高人民检察院重罪检察证据分析研究基地，北京 100088； 3.山西大学 法学院，山西 太原 030031；4.华东政法大学 刑事法学院，上海 201620
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-10 出版日期:2023-01-15 发布日期:2023-01-16
  • 作者简介:张保生（1956—），男，教授，博士，博士研究生导师，主要从事证据科学、司法文明研究。E-mail: bensenzh@cupl.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目（22SFB5033）。

The Coordinated Construction Path of Unified Forensic Appraisal Management System— Discussion with the Single Legislative Path

ZHANG Baosheng1,2, YUN Dan3, CHEN Bangda1,4, et al   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Evidence Science & Collaborative Innovation Center of Judicial Civilization, China University of Political Science and Law, Ministry of Education, Beijing 100088, China; 2. Analysis and Research Base for Serious Crime Procuratorial Evidence， Supreme People's Procuratorate, Beijing 100088, China ; 3. School of Law, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031, China ; 4. Criminal Justice College, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2022-08-10 Published:2023-01-15 Online:2023-01-16

PDF

摘要： 通过对我国司法鉴定规范的相对供给不足与立法模式分歧的研究，基于对《司法鉴定法》立法必要性、合理性和可行性的分析和质疑，论证了从法律规范、司法解释、部门规章和司法鉴定标准四个层面推进健全统一司法鉴定管理体制的协同化建设路径，即通过四个层面之间的协同作用产生合力，共同推进这一目标的实现。司法鉴定规范四个层面的区别有相对性，不同层面的规范可能具有同样的功能。鉴于我国司法鉴定实践中的许多问题均源于司法鉴定管理体制“顶层设计”方面的薄弱，未来应该加强司法鉴定基本原则与司法鉴定评价标准建设，并将其贯彻于现行司法鉴定技术标准之中，这是完善我国司法鉴定制度的一条捷径。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 管理体制, 协同化路径, 基本原则, 评价标准

Abstract: This paper explores the relative shortage of forensic appraisal regulations and the divergence regarding legislative models on forensic appraisal in China. Based on the analysis and questioning of the necessity, reasonableness, and feasibility of the enactment of Forensic Appraisal Law, we take the view that a path of coordinated construction should be taken from four levels, namely legal norms, judicial interpretations, administrative regulations and forensic appraisal standards, to jointly promote the coordinated construction path of unified forensic appraisal management system. Through the synergy between the four levels, we can jointly promote the realization of this goal. The differences between the four levels of forensic appraisal norms are relative, and norms at different levels may have the same functions. Since many problems existing in the forensic practice root from the weakness of the top-level-design of forensic regulation system, we should strengthen the construction of basic principles and evaluative standards of forensic appraisal, and embed them in the current forensic technical standards, which is the shortcut to improve the forensic appraisal system in China.

Key words: forensic appraisal, management system, coordinated path, basic principle, standards of evaluation

中图分类号: