主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2008 ›› Issue (02): 34-36.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

质疑对犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定期间的规定

吴常青;   

  1. 天津商业大学法学院 天津300134

Question the Regulation of Psychiatric Examination Period of Criminal Suspects

WU Chang-qing (School of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China)   

摘要: 我国刑事诉讼法和相关解释将对犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定的期间不计入羁押期限,是值得商榷的。应该认识到犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定在性质上类似于羁押,在德国和我国台湾等国家和地区,其是鉴定留置的一种类型,法律对其规定严格的实施要件,以防止对相对人权利不当的干涉。我国应从人权保障出发,在刑事诉讼法修改时,重新定位对犯罪嫌疑人精神病鉴定,并完善相关制度设置。

关键词: 精神病鉴定, 期间, 鉴定留置

Abstract: The law of criminal procedure and its explanations regulates that the period of psychiatric examination of suspects should be exempted from the period of detention, however this needs reconsideration. The psychiatric examination of suspects is, in nature, similar to detention, and is one kind of examination detention in German and Taiwan law. It is suggested that we put the psychiatric examination period in the proper position from the view of human right protection and improve its system design in the revision of criminal procedure law.

Key words: psychiatric examination, period, examination detention