主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

›› 2008 ›› Issue (03): 50-53.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

如何正确看待法医骨龄和刑事责任年龄

王鹏;朱广友;王新蕾;范利华;夏文涛;   

  1. 司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所,苏州大学基础医学法医系,南通大学医学院神经生物系,苏州大学基础医学法医系,苏州大学基础医学法医系 上海市200063,苏州大学基础医学法医系,苏州市215123,苏州市215123,南通市226001,苏州市215123,苏州市215123

How to treat the skeletal age of forensic medicine and age of criminal responsibility correctly

WANG Peng1,2,ZHU Guang-you2,FAN Li-hua2,XIA Wen-tao2,WANG Xin-lei3(1.Forensic department of Preclinical Medicine,Soochow University,Suzhou 215123;2.Institute of Forensic Science,Ministry of justice,Shanghai 200063;3.Department of Neurobiology,Medicine Col   

被引次数

9

摘要： 骨龄又叫骨骼测定年龄,刑法所规定的"刑事责任年龄"为某一个体的"生活年龄",二者所代表的含义不同,且存在着较大的差异。司法机关直接利用骨龄作为对犯罪嫌疑人定罪量刑的证据判案时常引发不小争议。故此,实现"骨龄"推断到"生活年龄"推断是法医任重而道远的任务。本文分析了二者的差异及原因,并呼吁尽快出台综合评定其个体"生活年龄"的全新标准或规范。

关键词: 骨龄, 生活年龄, 刑事责任年龄, 差异

Abstract: The skeletal age is the bone age determined in forensic medicine,while the age of criminal responsibility,which is defined in criminal law,is the age one,Iives.The above two ages have different meanings.Disputes often arise when skeletal age is used in judgment by judicial bodies,so it is an important and hard task for forensic medicine to determine the skeletal age close enough to living age.In the paper,the differences and the causes of the two ages are analyzed.It is urged that new and comprehensive standard or specification be drafted as soon as possible.

Key words: skeletal age, living age, age of criminal responsibility, difference