略论提高司法鉴定意见权威性——以刑事诉讼为视野

›› 2009 ›› Issue (01): 6-12.

略论提高司法鉴定意见权威性——以刑事诉讼为视野

胡锡庆;肖妤;陈邦达;

华东政法大学;中共上海市徐汇区委党校;司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所;

On Improving the Authority of Forensic Conclusions-In the View of Criminal Proceedings

HU Xi-qing1, XIAO Yu2, CHEN Bang-da3 (1. East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042; 2. CPC School of Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, China; 3. Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, P.R.China, Shanghai 200063, China

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 全国人大常委会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》的贯彻和执行,在实践中出现了新情况、新问题,特别是司法鉴定意见的权威性受到挑战。以刑事诉讼为视野,提高司法鉴定意见的权威性:一是完善鉴定人准入制度;二是建立科学的司法鉴定程序;三是完善司法鉴定管理制度;四是建立鉴定意见审查认证制度。

关键词: 准入制度, 鉴定程序, 规范管理, 庭审质证

Abstract: Since the implementation of "the Decision on the Management of Forensic Expertise by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress", many new situations and problems have appeared, one of which is the challenge to the authority of forensic conclusions. In the view of criminal proceedings, in order to improve the authority of forensic conclusions, following issues should be emphasized: first, improvement of the admittance system; second, establishment of the scientific appraisal procedure; third, improvement of the administrative management system; last, establishment of the cross-examination system for forensic conclusions.

Key words: admittance system, appraisal procedure, management, cross-examination

胡锡庆;肖妤;陈邦达;. 略论提高司法鉴定意见权威性——以刑事诉讼为视野[J]. , 2009(01): 6-12.

HU Xi-qing;XIAO Yu;CHEN Bang-da (. East China University of Political Science and Law;Shanghai 000;. CPC School of Xuhui District;Shanghai 000;China;. Institute of Forensic Science;Ministry of Justice;P.R.China;Shanghai 000;China. On Improving the Authority of Forensic Conclusions-In the View of Criminal Proceedings[J]. , 2009(01): 6-12.

[1]	金雷霆. 新《民事证据规定》视角下重新鉴定制度的解构——兼论《民事证据规定》第四十条 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2021, 119(6): 84-90.
[2]	郭华. 刑事诉讼中法医精神病鉴定争议的反思与理论诠释[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2020, 108(1): 1-7.
[3]	张伟, 郭卫. 血液中酒精含量检验司法鉴定程序规范化研究[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2020, 108(1): 93-94.
[4]	陈邦达, 包建明. 完善司法鉴定程序推进鉴定体制改革——《司法鉴定程序通则》评析[J]. , 2016, 89(6): 70-75.
[5]	远丽辉. 新《司法鉴定程序通则》相关条款探讨[J]. , 2016, 89(6): 81-84.
[6]	贾治辉, 朱兰, 宋利利, 朱昱. 论终止鉴定[J]. , 2016, 87(4): 19-24.
[7]	陈立杭. 我国鉴定意见可采性标准研究[J]. , 2014, 76(5): 91-94.
[8]	唐为明. 建筑工程司法鉴定问题的讨论[J]. , 2013, 70(5): 76-80.
[9]	台治强. 规制电子证据鉴定的几个基本问题 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2012, 61(2): 82-83.
[10]	郭泰和, 徐康莉. 知识产权案件司法鉴定程序之探讨[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2011, 59(6): 72-77.
[11]	陈瑞华. 鉴定意见的审查判断问题[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2011, 58(5): 1-6.
[12]	《涉案财物价格鉴定问题研究》课题组, . 浅论涉案财物的价格鉴定 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2011, 56(3): 87-90.
[13]	张晋红, 许琦科. 精神病鉴定程序的启动 ——以精神病事件的频发现象为背景 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2011, 55(2): 15-20.
[14]	许爱东. 试论我国司法鉴定回避制度的完善 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2011, 54(1): 13-17.
[15]	程军伟, . 司法鉴定的立法思考[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2010, 63(4): 6-10.