主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

›› 2009 ›› Issue (01): 17-21.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

错鉴损害的民事责任

赵杰;   

  1. 南京师范大学;

On the Civil Liability for the Consequence of Wrong Forensic Conclusions

ZHAO Jie (Law School of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China)   

被引次数

28

摘要： 司法鉴定结论不可能拥有绝对的准确率,一旦出现错鉴,必须要对因此带来的损害后果承担相应的法律责任。错鉴民事责任在形式上与违约责任、侵权责任和专家责任竞合,不论选择哪一种处理路径都存在着利弊的权衡,都需要对现有法律作适当的调整。需要确定错鉴责任承担主体,并对利害关系人和归责原则作出相应规定,对责任主体的过错程度作出评判。

关键词: 错鉴结论, 鉴定制度, 民事责任

Abstract: It is impossible for forensic conclusions to have absolute accuracy. Once a conclusion is wrong, there should be someone to undertake the legal liability for the consequence. The civil liability of wrong forensic conclusions overlaps with the breach of contract liability, tort liability and expert responsibility. No matter which way we choose to deal with it, we need to make suitable adjustment to the existing law. It is necessary to determine who should bear the wrong conclusion liability, and make rules for interested parties and principles for bearing liabilities, and evaluate the degree of fault on the "wrong doer".

Key words: wrong forensic conclusion, forensic expertise system, civil liability