主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2009 ›› Issue (05): 1-5.

• 论文 •    下一篇

社会司法鉴定人和职能司法鉴定人比较评介

杨开湘;宋扬;   

  1. 中南大学法学院;

A Comparative Study on Forensic Science Practitioners in Social Institutions and Investigatory Organs

YANG Kai-xiang, SONG Yang (Law School of Zhongnan University, Changsha 400083, China)   

摘要: 全国人大常委会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》旨在建立统一司法鉴定管理体制,然而,实践中出现的鉴定机构和鉴定人管理双轨制使《决定》的立法初衷未能实现。"两高"、"三部"《通知》试图对此予以校正,将侦查机关所属"职能鉴定人"一并纳入司法行政部门的登记管理体系。由此出现的社会司法鉴定人和职能司法鉴定人仍然在管理上存在差异,从统一司法鉴定管理体制的角度看,职能司法鉴定人依旧具有不合理性。

关键词: 社会司法鉴定人, 职能司法鉴定人, 比较分析

Abstract: The "Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Administration of Forensic Appraisal" aims at establishing a unified forensic appraisal administration system. However, due to the bipartite administrative system for forensic science institutions and forensic practitioners, the goal of the Decision has not been achieved successfully. The "Circulation", which was formulated by the Supreme People’s Court, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and the Ministry of Justice, attempts to make correction, and brings forensic practitioners within investigatory organs under the registration management of judicial administrative departments. Therefore, there is difference between the administration of forensic social forensic practitioners and functional forensic practitioners. From the view of the unified forensic appraisal administration system, the administration of functional forensic practitioners is still not in reason.

Key words: social forensic practitioner, functional forensic practitioner, comparative study