骨折延迟愈合或骨不连接伤残等级评定66例分析

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2010 ›› Issue (4): 72-74.

骨折延迟愈合或骨不连接伤残等级评定66例分析

李红梅;施晓玲;

苏州同济司法鉴定所;苏州市中级人民法院;

出版日期:2010-04-30 发布日期:2023-04-03

Analysis of 66 Disability Rating Cases of Delayed Coalesce and Unjoined Fractures

LI Hong-mei1,SHI Xiao-ling2(1.Suzhou Tongji Forensic Science Institute,Suzhou 215007,China;2.Suzhou Intermediate People's Court,Suzhou 215007,China)

Published:2010-04-30 Online:2023-04-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨骨折延迟愈合、骨折不连接伤残等级评定条款的适用。方法从患者的性别、年龄、骨折部位/种类、合并疾病情况、治疗方式、骨折愈合时间、伤残等级等资料分析66例骨折延迟愈合、骨折不连接的评残案件。结果进行伤残等级鉴定60例,其中八级2例,九级11例,十级28例,未构成伤残19例,还有6例未申请伤残鉴定。结论现行国家鉴定标准尚无骨折延迟愈合、骨折不连接的明确条款,故有一定的不适应性,在实践中可比照最相类似条款进行评残。

关键词: 骨折延迟愈合, 骨折不连接, 伤残评定

Abstract: Objective To explore the applicability of the evaluation standard of disability degree for coalesce and unjoined fractures.Method 66 disability cases of coalesce and unjoined fractures were analyzed based on data of the sex,age,fracture location,fracture type,complicating diseases,treatment method,healing period,disability grade and so on.Result Of 60 cases,2 were determined to grade 8(disability degree),11 to grade 9,28 to grade 10,19 to non-disability;and 6 cases didn't apply for evaluation.Conclusion There are no specific provisions in the present standards to determine the disability degree for coalesce and unjoined fractures.,but similar provisions can be used.

Key words: coalesce, unjoined fracture, disability evaluation

李红梅, 施晓玲, . 骨折延迟愈合或骨不连接伤残等级评定66例分析[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2010(4): 72-74.

LI Hong-mei, SHI Xiao-ling(.Suzhou Tongji Forensic Science Institute, Suzhou , China, .Suzhou Intermediate People's Court, Suzhou , China). Analysis of 66 Disability Rating Cases of Delayed Coalesce and Unjoined Fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2010(4): 72-74.

[1]	范飞, 戴鑫华, 占梦军等. 肢体大关节功能障碍残疾标准比较研究[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2019, 104(3): 92-97.
[2]	吴兰剑. 胫腓骨骨折截骨延长术治疗伤残评定2例[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2019, 104(3): 108-110.
[3]	王亮胡海琨范飞邓振华. 牙齿损伤国内外残疾标准比较[J]. , 2018, 99(4): 78-82.
[4]	高晨飞高运申. 孤眼外伤致盲伤残评定1例[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2018, 96(1): 101-102.
[5]	高娟, 陆晓明, 陈煜峰, 沈宇, 曹婧. 下肢骨折及其对关节运动活动的影响[J]. , 2017, 93(4): 37-42.
[6]	刘丽, 崔国兴, 缪娬君, 戴佳丽. 永久植入式人工假体损坏致残等级评定探讨 ——附4例案例分析[J]. , 2017, 92(3): 82-85.
[7]	江丽娇, 陈燕嫦. 颅脑外伤开颅术后再次外伤伤残评定1例[J]. , 2017, 91(2): 103-105.
[8]	张平, 施晓玲. 颅脑外伤开颅术后再次外伤伤残评定1例[J]. , 2014, 77(6): 118-118.
[9]	周建东, 张素娟. 法医学伤残评定中的伤病关系[J]. , 2014, 75(4): 97-99.
[10]	刘冬梅王云介. 骨盆骨折伤残重新鉴定65例分析[J]. , 2014, 75(4): 25-27.
[11]	刘冬梅, 沈寒坚, 夏文涛, 彭书雅, 周姝. 医疗干预对损伤程度鉴定与伤残等级评定的影响[J]. , 2014, 73(2): 39-42.
[12]	张敏范利华. 肩关节损伤致肢体功能障碍程度评价方法比较[J]. , 2013, 67(2): 42-45.
[13]	夏晴, 范利华, 吴军. 交通伤致手功能丧失的伤残评定 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2012, 64(5): 79-82.
[14]	应充亮, 万雷. 足弓破坏法医临床学鉴定的影像学理论与实践 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2012, 62(3): 67-70.
[15]	刘瑞珏. 交通伤后视觉功能障碍伤残评定 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2012, 62(3): 71-73.