主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2013 ›› Issue (3): 0-0.

• 鉴定论坛 •    下一篇

医疗损害因果关系及其原因力的定性定量分析

冯龙,于晓军   

  1. 汕头大学医学院法医教研室
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-28 修回日期:2013-03-27 出版日期:2013-05-15 发布日期:2013-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 于晓军

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the causality and causative potency in medical damage

  • Received:2013-03-28 Revised:2013-03-27 Published:2013-05-15 Online:2013-06-04

摘要: 当前国内的医疗纠纷问题有日益严重的趋势,医疗损害及其责任的认定机制存在概念的混乱和权限的不明确是造成这种情况的主要原因之一。根据我国《侵权责任法》中有关医疗损害责任的相关规定,结合法医鉴定实践经验和相关文献,提出将医疗损害的因果关系及其原因力的定性定量分析与伤亡原因及其参与度的分析观点相统一,同时,力图澄清医疗损害中法医鉴定的范畴和权限、原因力的定性定量和责任度等相关概念,以期为解决各种医疗损害事件提供更为客观真实和公平公正的科学证据。

关键词:

Abstract: [Abstract] The medical dispute in current China has become increasingly serious, we hold the opinion that, one of the primary causes of this situation is confusion of the concept and indetermination of the permission in identification mechanism about the medical damage and corresponding responsibility. In this article, after deliberating the relevant regulations about medical damage in Tort Liability Law combined with the experience in medicolegal expertise and related articles, we make a point to unify the analysis of qualitative and quantitative about causality and causative potency in medical damage and causes of casualty and its corresponding degree of contribution, meantime, we also try to clarify the scope and permission in medicolegal expertise, concepts of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the causality and degree of responsibility. As a result of qualitative and quantitative analysis of the causality and causative potency in medical damage, and consideration mainly based on ICD (Internetional Stastical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems) of WHO, we finally classify all the factors that involved in the medical damage into eight categories after : underlying cause, intervening cause, contributory cause, inductive cause, immediate cause, irrelevant factor, synergetic cause, combined cause. The respective corresponding causative potency (degree of contribution) are : 60%-100%, 30%-40%, 20%-30%, 0%-20%, 0 or 100%, 0, f%/n,100%×n. On one hand, the point in this article can guide us analyze the causes in medical damage much objectively and accurately, guarantee the judicial expertise of medical dispute fairer and more reasonable and avoid fault or missing caused from confusion of causality in judicial expertise, on the other hand, it can also be a more scientific evidence for judge and sentencing and civil compensation in cases of medical tort. At last, we think it can make a significant contribution to calm down the medical dispute and relieve the tense doctor-patient relationship.

Key words: medical damage, causality, causative potency, degree of contribution, degree of responsibility