主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2013 ›› Issue (3): 0-0.

• 鉴定论坛 •    下一篇

浅析医疗损害鉴定中的问题及其对策

李荣,李开,王建文   

  1. 南京医科大学法医学系
  • 收稿日期:2012-10-22 修回日期:2012-11-16 出版日期:2013-05-15 发布日期:2013-06-04
  • 通讯作者: 李荣

Analysis of Identification System of Medical Damage Since the implementation of tort liability law

  • Received:2012-10-22 Revised:2012-11-16 Published:2013-05-15 Online:2013-06-04

摘要:  通过分析人民法院采信医疗过错司法鉴定意见的实际情况,分析我国医疗损害鉴定制度存在的问题,为建立一个符合中国国情的医疗损害鉴定制度提供思路和参考意见。统计分析2010年7月以后人民法院受理并委托南京医科大学司法鉴定所鉴定医疗过错、且取得委托方满意度调查结果的46例案件。人民法院对46例案件医疗过错鉴定的采信率为93.4%,但普遍反映鉴定超过期望时限。人民法院对医疗过错司法鉴定总体上是满意的,《侵权责任法》并未解决医疗损害鉴定“双轨制”的问题,建议制定统一的医疗损害鉴定制度。

关键词:  , 医疗损害;司法鉴定;鉴定制度

Abstract: Abstract: Objective According to operating condition of tort liability law in the people's court and actual situation of the judicial identification of medical harm, this article provided a train of thought and countermeasure how to establish a suitable medical damage judicial identification system for China's national conditions. Methods 46 cases were analysed from our institute since 2010 July, all which were entrusted by people's court with the cases of medical damage identification, in the meantime we also combined with the people's court use situation. Results a total of 26 cases(56.6%), involved in surgery;93.5% cases existed certain medical fault, and existed Causal relationship between medical fault and damage results, most of which were slightly Causal relationship; the people's court adoped 93.4% of total of cases, simultaneously also reflected a question that some cases were timeout. Conclusion The people's Court was satisfied with Identification System of Medical Damage, but two models in identification system of medical damage still existed since tort liability law promulgated, so this article suggested that a unified approved medical damage identification system should be established.

Key words: Key words: medical damage, forensic identification, identification system