主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (6): 1-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2020.06.001

• 鉴定制度 •    下一篇

刑事错案中科学证据相关问题的实证分析及其控制路径

谢步高   

  1. 福建师范大学法学院,福建 福州,350107
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-18 出版日期:2020-12-25 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 作者简介:谢步高(1983—),男,讲师,博士,主要从事证据法学与物证技术研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(17CFX066)

Empirical Analysis and Control Regarding Scientific Evidence in Misjudged Criminal Cases

XIE Bugao   

  1. Law School of Fujian Normal University, Fujian 350117, China
  • Received:2019-03-18 Published:2020-12-25 Online:2020-12-25

摘要: 科学证据因科学性特征,成为21世纪司法证明的重要手段。但随着刑事错案中科学证据问题的不断披露,科学证据的科学可靠性受到极大质疑,但对此问题在法律人和法庭科学工作者之间却有着明显的认识差异。为此,首先从近些年司法实践入手,客观呈现科学证据在司法实践中的应用现状,为全面认识科学证据可靠性提供一个合适视角和基础。其次,以公开报道的错案实例为研究样本,整理归纳出与科学证据相关的71起错案,梳理出错案中科学证据相关问题,并对其进行类型化分析,探究错案中不同科学证据问题的成因。最后,结合科学证据特点及其在错案中的应用情况,探讨预防错案中科学证据问题的合理控制路径。

关键词: 刑事错案;科学证据;实证分析;控制路径

Abstract: Scientific evidence has become an important means of judicial proof in the 21st century due to its scientific characteristics. However, with the continuous disclosure of problems relating to scientific evidence in misjudged criminal cases, the reliability of scientific evidence has been greatly challenged. There are obvious differences in understanding of this issue between legal persons and forensic scientists. Therefore, this paper first presents the current status of the application of scientific evidence in judicial practice to provide a suitable perspective and basis for comprehensively understanding the reliability of scientific evidence. Secondly, taking the misjudged cases as the sample, 71 misjudged cases relating to scientific evidence were sorted out and the problems of scientific evidence in these cases were summed up. Then analysis was performed according to their types to explore the causes of different scientific evidence issues in the misjudged cases. Finally, based on the characteristics of scientific evidence and its application in the misjudged cases, this paper discusses some reasonable control paths of scientific evidence in preventing and correcting the cases.

Key words: misjudged criminal case; scientific evidence; empirical analysis; control path

中图分类号: