指纹细节特征区域和数量对似然比评价方法的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2024.010

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2024 ›› Issue (1): 66-73.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2024.010

指纹细节特征区域和数量对似然比评价方法的影响

李康^{1, 2}, 罗亚平¹

1. 中国人民公安大学侦查学院，北京 100038； 2. 浙江警察学院刑事科学技术系，浙江杭州 310053

收稿日期:2023-09-26 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-16
通讯作者: 罗亚平（1965—），女，教授，博士，博士研究生导师，主要从事痕迹检验技术研究。E-mail：lypsslk@163.com
作者简介:李康（1988—），男，讲师，博士研究生，主要从事痕迹检验技术研究。E-mail：likang@zjjcxy.cn
基金资助:
中国人民公安大学刑事科学技术双一流创新研究专项（2023SYL06)。

Effects of the Region and Amount of Fingerprint Minutiae on the Evaluation of Likelihood Ratio

LI Kang^{1, 2}, LUO Yaping¹

1. College of Investigation, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China;
2. Department of Forensic Science, Zhejiang Police College, Hangzhou 310053, China

Received:2023-09-26 Published:2024-01-15 Online:2024-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探析不同指纹细节特征的区域和数量对基于指纹自动识别系统（automatic fingerprint identification system，AFIS）得分的指纹证据似然比评价方法的影响，为指纹证据似然比评价模型的构建提供科学可靠的AFIS得分数据。方法筛选并制作200枚模拟现场指纹，按照指纹中心和左、右三角3种不同特征区域以及5～16个的12种不同数量的细节特征进行组合，通过AFIS发送到自行构建的同源指纹数据库和千万人级的异源指纹数据库中查询比对，采用统计学方法量化分析不同细节特征区域和数量下的同源和异源比对得分。结果对于不同细节特征区域，同源指纹相似度得分的集中趋势、高分段区间和最大值均明显优于异源指纹，异源指纹不同区域均表现出相近的数据集中趋势。对于不同细节特征数量，随着细节特征数量的增加，同源指纹得分变化区间比异源要大，同源得分的分散度逐渐增加，但异源指纹得分数据在不同数量范围内的细节特征表现出不同的特点，呈现出分段情况。结论运用AFIS对影响指纹证据评价方法的细节特征区域和数量进行“黑箱”实验，该量化分析方法简便易行，也符合当前超大容量数据库环境下的指纹证据影响因素量化分析的实际。数据分析结果有助于丰富鉴定人对细节特征区域和数量的认识，有利于构建科学可靠的指纹证据似然比评价模型。

关键词: 指纹鉴定, 特征区域, 特征数量, 同源指纹, 异源指纹

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of different regions and amounts of fingerprint minutiae on the evaluation of likelihood ratio of fingerprint evidence， based on automatic fingerprint identification system (AFIS) score, and to provide scientific and reliable AFIS score data for the construction of likelihood ratio model for fingerprint evidence. Methods 200 fingerprints simulated to those collected at crime scene were made. According to three different minutiae regions (the center and left/right delta) and 12 different minutiae numbers ranging from 5 to 16, the fingerprints were assembled and sent to both the self-constructed same-source fingerprint database and the ten-million-person different-source fingerprint database for matching using AFIS. The match scores from the two databases were analyzed quantitatively using statistical methods. Results For different regions of fingerprints, the results including concentration trend, high score range, and maximum values of similarity scores for same-source fingerprints were significantly better than those of different-source fingerprints. Different-source fingerprints exhibited a similar data of concentration trend across different regions. Regarding the amounts of different minutia, as the amount increased, the score variation range of same-source fingerprints was larger than that of different-source fingerprints, and the dispersion of scores of same-source fingerprints gradually increased. However, the scores of different-source fingerprints exhibited different characteristics for different amounts of minutia, showing segmented situations.Conclusion This study used AFIS to conduct “black box” experiments on the region and amount of minutia influencing the evaluation method for fingerprint evidence. The quantitative analysis method is simple and easy to implement, and is also in line with the actual quantitative analysis of the factors affecting the fingerprint evidence in ultra-large-capacity databases. The results help to enrich the forensic expert’s understanding of the region and amount of minutiae, which is conducive to the construction of a scientific and reliable likelihood ratio evaluation model for fingerprint evidence.

Key words: fingerprint identification, region of minutia, amount of minutia, same-source fingerprint, different-source fingerprint

中图分类号:

DF794.1

李康, 罗亚平. 指纹细节特征区域和数量对似然比评价方法的影响[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024(1): 66-73.

LI Kang, LUO Yaping. Effects of the Region and Amount of Fingerprint Minutiae on the Evaluation of Likelihood Ratio[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024(1): 66-73.

参考文献

[1] 张翠玲，谭铁君. 基于贝叶斯统计推理的法庭证据评价[J]. 刑事技术， 2018，43（4）： 265-271.
[2] MORRISON G S. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience： testing of validity and reliability， and approaches to forensic voice comparison[J]. Science & Justice， 2014，54（3）： 245-256.
[3] OWEN E F， ROGER J D. Expressing evaluative opinions： a position statement[J]. Science & Justice， 2011，51（4）： 212.
[4] BERGER C E H， BUCKLETON J， CHAMPOD C， et al. Evidence evaluation： a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T[J]. Science & Justice， 2011，51（2）： 43-49.
[5] ALBERINK I， JONGH A D， RODRIGUEZ C. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores： the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences， 2014，59（1）： 70-81.
[6] BUNCH S， WEVERS G. Application of likelihood ratios for firearm and toolmark analysis[J]. Science & Justice， 2013，53（2）： 223-229.
[7] BACHRACH B， JAIN A， JUNG S， et al. A statistical validation of the individuality and repeatability of striated tool marks： screwdrivers and tongue and groove pliers?[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences， 2010，55（2）： 348-357.
[8] SHARMA V， BAINS M， VERMA R， et al. Novel use of logistic regression and likelihood ratios for the estimation of gender of the writer from a database of handwriting features[J]. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences， 2023，55（1）： 89-106.
[9] WYDRA J， MATUSZEWSKI S. Likelihood ratio to evaluate handwriting evidence using similarity index[J]. Law， Probability and Risk， 2022，21（1）： 21-42.
[10] CHEN X H， CHAMPOD C， YANG X， et al. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features[J]. Forensic Science International， 2018，282： 101-110.
[11] PUCH-SOLIS R， POPE S， EVETT I. Calculating likelihood ratios for a mixed DNA profile when a contribution from a genetic relative of a suspect is proposed[J]. Science & Justice， 2010，50（4）： 205-209.
[12] MICHALSKA A， MARTYNA A， ZADORA G. Investigation of various factors influencing Raman spectra interpretation with the use of likelihood ratio approach[J]. Forensic Science International， 2018，282： 60-73.
[13] ALLEN R J. Exact solutions to Bayesian and maximum likelihood problems in facial identification when population and error distributions are known[J]. Forensic Science International， 2008，179（2/3）： 211-218.
[14] ISHIHARA S. Strength of linguistic text evidence： A fused forensic text comparison system[J]. Forensic Science International， 2017，278： 184-197.
[15] LEEGWATER A J， MEUWLY D， SJERPS M， et al. Performance study of a score-based likelihood ratio system for forensic fingermark comparison[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences， 2017，62（3）： 626-640.
[16] European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science[R]. Beijing： Renmin University of China Press， 2015：6-29.
[17] European Fingerprint Working Group. Best practice manual for fingerprint examination[R].[S.l]：European Network of Forensic Science Institutes，2015：4-57.
[18] Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science. Standard for Friction Ridge Examination Conclusions
[S/OL]. [2023-09-17].https： //www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2020/03/23/OSAC%20FRS%20CONCLUSIONS%
20Document%20Template%202020_Final.pdf.
[19] HOLDREN J P， LANDER E S， PRESS W， et al. Forensic science in criminal courts： Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods[R]. [S.l.]：President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology， 2016.
[20] National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States： A path forward[M]. Washington， D.C.， USA： National Academies Press， 2009： 43.

指纹细节特征区域和数量对似然比评价方法的影响

Effects of the Region and Amount of Fingerprint Minutiae on the Evaluation of Likelihood Ratio

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李硕, 韩文强, 李康, 杨俊, 罗亚平. 千万人级数据库下相似异源指纹出现情况及排位关系研究[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2023, 0(6): 69-74.
[2]	彭霄. 指纹鉴定标准研究[J]. , 2014, 0(3): 66-73.
[3]	宋远升;. 论指纹鉴定证据的法律冲突与抉择[J]. , 2009, 0(06): 15-19.