关键词: 司法鉴定援助, 责任主体, 责任分配

Abstract:  In promoting the construction of the forensic appraisal aid system with the characteristics of public welfare, the key problem is to clarify the responsible subjects and distinguish the responsibility of different subjects. Through the analysis of China’s forensic appraisal aid practice, three main aid models are identified: the “pure institutional model”, the “state-institution integration model” and the “state, institution and individual co-participation model”. At the same time, it is found that there are three pairs of contradictions in the distribution of the responsibilities of forensic appraisal aid, which are the contradiction between the unlimited liability and the limited liability of the state, the contradiction between the pursuit of profit and the performance of public welfare by the appraisal organization, and the contradiction regarding whether the applicant has liability or not. In view of this, this article, from the legal and moral dimensions, expounds on the necessity for the state, institutions and aid applicants to serve as accountable  entity forensic appraisal aid. On the basis of fully considering China’s national conditions, in the field of forensic appraisal aid, the author puts forward the optimal responsibility distribution model: The state should firmly shoulder the responsibility, the forensic appraisal institutions should actively take on the “feasible” obligations, and the applicants should be required to bear a reasonable burden, and the social forces should be steered to gradually participate in the field of forensic appraisal aid, aiming to build a stable, efficient and sustainable forensic appraisal aid system. 

Key words: forensic appraisal aid, accountable entity, distribution of responsibility