人体损伤残疾评定域外标准概要与启示

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2024.04.009

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国法庭科学/司法鉴定标准化体系正处于全面建设阶段，作为人身损害赔偿重要依据之一的残疾评定标准应根据医学、法医学的进步不断加以完善，是公正处置此类案件的必要前提。当前应通过专业领域的跨学科合作，例如医学、心理学、社会学等，更好地理解和把握残疾的多层次性质，并在此基础上提高我国残疾标准的制修订能力，健全标准体系，使之更具科学性、客观性和可操作性。同时，需重视国际经验的借鉴，提高我国残疾评定标准的国际化水平及国际交流。通过分析北美地区、欧洲地区、亚洲地区及大洋洲地区国家的残疾评定标准，从适用范围、标准体系之特点、架构和理念等展开讨论，为我国人体损伤残疾评定标准的研制和应用提供国际化视野和新的思路。

关键词: 残疾, 标准, 司法鉴定, 人体损伤致残程度分级

Abstract: The standardization of forensic science in China is currently undergoing comprehensive development. One of the crucial bases for compensation in personal injury cases and a key step towards achieving a path of fairness and justice is the standardization of disability standards, which should be continuously improved in line with advances in medicine and forensic science. The current focus on refining China's disability standards emphasizes their scientific, objective, and operational aspects. Collaborations across disciplines such as medicine, psychology, and sociology contribute to a better understanding and assessment of the multifaceted nature of disabilities. Simultaneously, it is essential to place emphasis on drawing insights from international experiences to enhance the internationalization and global exchange of domestic disability assessment standards. This review analyzes disability assessment standards in North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania, exploring aspects such as applicability, characteristics, framework, and underlying principles, aiming to provide an international perspective for the development and future application of China's standards for disabilities resulting from personal injuries, offering novel insights for domestic standard enhancements.

Key words: disability, standard, forensic appraisal, classification of severity of disability caused by physical injuries

中图分类号:

DF795.4

施蕾, 邱丽蓉, 鲁婷, 唐鲜娥, 薛冶, 范飞, 占梦军, 罗宇鹏, 邓振华. 人体损伤残疾评定域外标准概要与启示[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024(4): 65-74.

SHI Lei, QIU Lirong, LU Ting, TANG Xian’e, XUE Ye, FAN Fei, ZHAN Mengjun, LUO Yupeng, DENG Zhenhua. Foreign Standards and Implications for Physical Disability Assessment[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024(4): 65-74.

参考文献

参考文献：
[ 1 ] RANAVAYA M I，BRIGHAM C R. International use of the AMA guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[J]. Guides Newsletter，2020，25（2）： 3-8.
[ 2 ] American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[M].6th ed，2008th. Chicago，USA： American Medical Association，2008.
[ 3 ] American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[M].6th ed，2021st. Chicago，USA： American Medical Association，2021.
[ 4 ] American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[M].6th ed，2022nd. Chicago，USA： American Medical Association，2022.
[ 5 ] American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[M].6th ed，2023th. Chicago，USA： American Medical Association，2023.
[ 6 ] American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[M].4th ed. Chicago，USA： American Medical Association，1993.
[ 7 ] American Medical Association. Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment [M].3rd ed. Chicago，USA：American Medical Association，1990.
[ 8 ] Permanent impairment rating[EB/OL].[2024-01-24]. htt-ps：//www.wcb.mb.ca/permanent-impairment-rating.
[ 9 ] Assessing disability in Europe—similarities and differences[EB/OL].[2024-01-24]. https：//book.coe.int/en/inte-gration-of-people-with-disabilities/2410-assessing-di-sability-in-europe-similarities-and-differences.html.
[10] Improving disability assessment procedures in the European Union[EB/OL]. [2024-01-24]. https：//www.edffe-ph.org/publications/improving-disability-assessment-pro-cedures-in-the-european-union/.
[11] Barème d’évaluation médico-légale[M/OL]. [2024-01-25]. https：//www.lgdj.fr/bareme-d-evaluation-medico-legale-9782869119680.html.
[12] MICHAUD J，JOURDAIN P，CHODKIEWICZ J P，et al. Barème indicatif d’évaluation des taux d’incapacité en droit commun[M]. Toul，FRA： Berger-Lavrault，2003.
[13] LUCAS P. Guide Barème Européen d’évaluation médicale des atteintes à l’intégrité physique et psychique[M]. [S.l.]：Anthémis SA，2010.
[14] Work Injury Compensation Medical Board Ministry of Manpower Singapore. A guide to the assessment of traumatic injuries and occupational diseases for work injury compensation[M].6th ed.Singapore：Work Injury Compensation Medical Board Ministry of Manpower Singapore，2022.
[15] American Medical Association. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment[M].5th ed. Chicago，USA： American Medical Association，2001.
[16] KIM Y B，LEE S G，PARK C W，et al. Korean guideline development for the evaluation of permanent impairment of the spine： proposal by the Korean Academy of Medical sciences Committee[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S307-S313.
[17] BAIK S H，LEE K S，JEONG S Y，et al. Development of a rating system for digestive system impairments： Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S271-S276.
[18] CHIN H S，PARK S H，PARK I K，et al. Guideline development for the evaluation of visual impairment in Ko- rea[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S252-S257.
[19] JANG S H，RAH U W，KIM Y C，et al. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline—rating the impairment in pain[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S330-S337.
[20] JUNG H Y，KO T S，KIM H D，et al. Korean Academy of Medical Sciences pediatric impairment guideline for brain lesion[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S323-S329.
[21] KIM H C，KIM J S，LEE K H，et al. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline rating the physical impairment： lower extremities[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S299-S306.
[22] KIM W S，MOON K C，PARK M C，et al. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline on the skin and related system： Impairment evaluation of disfigurement in skin and appearance[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S314-S322.
[23] PARK C W，DO N Y，RHA K S，et al. Development of guideline for rating the physical impairment of otolaryngologic field[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S258-S266.
[24] YU J H，KIM S H，SOHN S H，et al. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline rating the physical impairment; kidney，bladder，urethra，male and female reproductive systems （preliminary report）[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S277-S287.
[25] PARK J H，KIM H C，LEE J H，et al. Development of Korean Academy of Medical Sciences guideline for rating physical disability of upper extremity[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S288-S298.
[26] LEE K S，SHIM J J，YOON S M，et al. Disability evaluation of the pain： The present and prospect in Korea[J]. Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society，2009，45（5）： 293-296.
[27] KIM H，LEE K Y，KIM J T，et al. Guideline of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences for assessing respiratory impairment[J]. Journal of Korean Medical Science，2009，24（S2）： S267-S270.
[28] Safe Work Australia. Comparison of workers’compensation arrangements in Australia and New Zealand[M]. Australian Government - Safe Work Australia，2012.
[29] Safety，Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988—Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment Edition 3.0[EB/OL]. [2024-01-25]. https：//www.legislation.gov.au/F2023L00203/asmade.
[30] Safety，Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988—Guide to the Assessment of the Degree of Permanent Impairment Edition 2.1-Variation No. 1 of 2011[EB/OL]. [2024-01-26]. https：//www.legislation.gov.au/F2011L02519/asmade/text.
[31] Workers Compensation Regulator. Queensland’s guidelines for evaluation of permanent impairment[M].2nd ed.Queensl，Australia：Workers Compensation Regulator，2016.
[32] WALLS C，DRYSON E，GORMAN D，et al. Time for a change[J]. The New Zealand Medical Journal，2020，133（1520）.
[33] 鲁婷，范飞，占梦军，等.国际视野比较与思考下的《人体损伤致残程度分级》评价[J]. 证据科学，2022，30（3）：374-383.

[1]	张颖. 人工智能浪潮下司法鉴定的机遇与挑战[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(5): 11-17.
[2]	唐勇. 法医精神病鉴定中的价值取向与伦理问题[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(5): 86-92.
[3]	拜荣静. 司法鉴定机构数据安全的规范进路[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(4): 1-9.
[4]	陈喆. “其他类”司法鉴定管理的困境与改革[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(4): 10-20.
[5]	裴云霞, 洪慧, 包美玲, 邓俊, 陈岷轩, 张强. 农业环境损害鉴定中受体植物的损害因素判别及损害程度分析[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(4): 40-48.
[6]	郭超, 戈奕文, 吕俊岗. 虚拟治理成本法在公益诉讼环境损害司法鉴定中的应用研究—基于132个案例的实证分析[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(3): 1-8.
[7]	王晴, 张晴, 郝永生, 杜凯, 赵宗山, 姚甲强, 吕俊岗. 我国海洋环境污染司法鉴定问题研究——基于2017—2022年涉海裁判文书的分析[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(3): 9-14.
[8]	徐路遥, 刘聪, 刘子龙. 虚拟现实技术在法医临床学领域的潜在价值[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(3): 23-31.
[9]	沈臻懿, 杜志淳. “法工交融”背景下司法鉴定专门人才培养路径研究——以政法院校侦查学、刑事科学技术专业发展为视角[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(3): 70-75.
[10]	王强, 孙大明. 精神科医疗损害司法鉴定标准适用困境与实践进路[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(3): 76-83.
[11]	马陈骏, 张清华. 公安机关鉴定二元监管体制的构建路径[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(3): 84-93.
[12]	郭金霞. 俄罗斯司法鉴定的立法体系及借镜思考[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(2): 1-10.
[13]	宫雪. 我国司法鉴定管理体制的完善路径镜鉴——以英国专家证人管理改革为例[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(2): 33-46.
[14]	剪宏伟. 司法鉴定人职称制度现状与思考[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(2): 99-104.
[15]	王昌, 窦川坦, 高洪梅, 张茂修. 亲权鉴定风险防范分析[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2024, 0(2): 105-110.