主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2025 ›› Issue (6): 71-77.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2025.06.008

• 鉴定论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

司法鉴定退案现实困境及其破解

朱    达   

  1. 天津市南开区人民法院,天津 300190
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-20 出版日期:2025-11-15 发布日期:2025-11-25
  • 作者简介:朱达(1989—),男,四级法官助理,硕士,主要从事法理学研究。E-mail:18522675392@163.com

The Practical Dilemmas of Forensic Appraisal Dismissal and Their Solutions

ZHU Da   

  1. Tianjin Nankai District People’s Court, Tianjin 300190, China
  • Received:2024-02-20 Published:2025-11-15 Online:2025-11-25

摘要: 鉴定机构退案的深层次原因既有技术性等客观因素,也有鉴定机构为追求评价优势而主动规避疑难复杂案件的因素。研究揭示,司法鉴定退案程序在实践层面存在五类关键问题:退案审查机制薄弱、法院与鉴定机构协作机制缺失、配套保障服务不足、制约平衡机制缺位以及监管制度协同性欠缺。针对上述问题,通过完善退案审查标准、构建常态化沟通平台、强化技术保障与资源支持、建立双向制约机制等路径,可系统性优化鉴定退案流程,减少不合理退案现象,增强司法鉴定工作的高效性、透明性和可信性。

关键词: 司法鉴定退案, 现实困境, 平衡性

Abstract: The underlying reasons for appraisal institutions’ dismissal of cases stem not only from technical and other objective factors but also from their tendency to proactively avoid difficult and complex cases in pursuit of better evaluation performance. This paper reveals that the forensic appraisal dismissal process faces five key practical issues: a weak review mechanism for dismissals, a lack of collaboration between courts and appraisal institutions, insufficient supporting services, an absence of checks and balances, and poor coordination within the regulatory system. To address these problems, measures such as refining dismissal review standards, establishing a regular communication platform, strengthening technical support and resource allocation, and instituting a two-way accountability mechanism can be implemented. These steps will systematically improve the appraisal dismissal process, reduce unreasonable dismissals, and enhance the efficiency, transparency, and credibility of forensic appraisal work.

Key words: forensic appraisal dismissal, practical dilemma, balance

中图分类号: