主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2026 ›› Issue (1): 9-20.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2026.01.002

• 鉴定制度 • 上一篇    下一篇

论司法鉴定中专门性问题的范围

肖承海,刘    郴   

  1. 中国政法大学 刑事司法学院,北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-19 出版日期:2026-01-15 发布日期:2026-01-22
  • 作者简介:肖承海(1974—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事侦查学、司法鉴定学、证据法学研究。E-mail:infoxch@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(24BFX138)。

On the Scope of Specialized Issues in Forensic Appraisal

XIAO Chenghai, LIU Chen   

  1. School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2024-11-19 Published:2026-01-15 Online:2026-01-22

摘要: 关于司法鉴定中专门性问题的范围,在立法授权、权责分配和现实条件三个维度都存在一定的争议或难点。在立法授权方面,立法并未将鉴定中的专门性问题限于“四大类”,而是肯定了“其他类”鉴定同样属于鉴定。因而,对鉴定中专门性问题的范围须作实质判断:从鉴定人与法官之间的权责分配角度,鉴定中的专门性问题应当包括案件中所有依照常人感官无法认知、依照一般常识无法判断的技术性事实问题,以及获得立法、司法解释特别授权,可由社会机构、行政机关在诉讼中作出评断的规范性事实问题。在此基础上,这些事实问题还须具备能够实施鉴定的现实条件,才能成为鉴定的对象。这要求对其实施鉴定既需要具备成熟可靠的科学技术条件,也不得有损实体公正、程序正义、诉讼效率等诉讼价值。

关键词: 专门性问题, 鉴定事项, 鉴定对象, 司法鉴定制度

Abstract: With respect to the scope of specialized issues of forensic appraisal, there are certain disputes or difficulties to be resolved in three aspects: legislative authorization, distribution of power, responsibility between forensic experts and judges, and actual conditions. In terms of legislative authorization, the legislation does not limit specialized issues of forensic appraisal to the “four major categories”, but affirms that “other categories” also belong to forensic appraisal. Therefore, the scope of specialized issues of forensic appraisal must be substantively judged. From the perspective of the distribution of powers and responsibilities between forensic experts and judges, specialized issues of forensic appraisal should include all issues about technical fact in a case that cannot be understood by ordinary people's senses or cannot be judged according to common sense, as well as issues about normative fact that are specially authorized by legislation or judicial interpretation, to be judged by social institutions or administrative agencies in litigation. On this basis, these factual issues must also have actual conditions for the implementation of forensic appraisal before they can be the object of appraisal; this requires that the implementation of forensic appraisal has both mature and reliable scientific and technological conditions and does not undermine litigation values such as substantive justice, due process, and litigation efficiency.

Key words: specialized issue, item of forensic appraisal, object of forensic appraisal, forensic appraisal system

中图分类号: