主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2013 ›› Issue (5): 86-89.

• 鉴定论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

技术证据审核的困境与出路

李麒,王燕芳   

  1. 山西大学
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-20 修回日期:2013-07-09 出版日期:2013-09-15 发布日期:2013-10-14
  • 通讯作者: 李麒
  • 基金资助:
    山西省高级人民法院、山西大学法学院“技术证据审核法律问题研究”

Dilemma and Outlet of the technical evidence audit

  • Received:2013-02-20 Revised:2013-07-09 Published:2013-09-15 Online:2013-10-14

摘要: 全国人大常委会《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》实施后,人民法院原设的司法鉴定机构被撤销,司法鉴定走向了社会。司法鉴定社会化后出现了大量重复鉴定、虚假鉴定甚至错误鉴定的现象,由于缺乏了法院内部的专门知识人来解决专门问题,面对多份鉴定意见法官无法进行科学认知,陷入证据采信困境。为了确保技术证据的有效审查判断,最高人民法院合理配置现行司法资源,赋予了法院内部原有的司法技术人员技术证据审核职能。然而法理根据与法律规范的缺失使得技术证据审核制度在规范与实践层面均面临诸多困境。本文通过对技术证据审核的产生背景、审核行为的对象与内容、主体与权能、功能与目的的解读,阐明其行为的审理性质,以期解决这一制度面临的理论困境与实践难题,更好的发挥其诉讼价值。

关键词: 技术证据, 审核, 审理, Keywords: technical evidence, Audit, trial

Abstract: Abstract: After the implementation of the National People's Congress standing committee on the management of judicial appraisal,the original set of judicial authentication institutions was revoked, the judicial appraisal socialized. After the socialization of judicial authentication, a large number of repeat identifications, false identifications and even misidentifications came out. Due to the lack of internal expert to solve the special problems, in the face of a lot of appraisal Suggestions, the judge can't scientifically judge, admitted into dilemma. In order to ensure effective judgment of the technical evidence, the Supreme People's Court rational allocate the existing judicial resources, given audit function to the Court's internal original judicial technical personnel. However, the absence of the laws and regulations make the technical evidence audit system is faced with many difficulties in the specification and practice level. Based on the review of the background, the object and the content, main body and power, function and purpose of the audit, this paper clarify its behavior in trial nature, to solve the theory and practice problem, better play its lawsuit value.

中图分类号: