主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

›› 2014 ›› Issue (1): 1-5.

• 鉴定制度 •    下一篇

刑事诉讼专家辅助人的倾向性及界限

贾治辉   

  • 收稿日期:2013-11-18 出版日期:2014-01-15 发布日期:2014-02-13
  • 通讯作者: 贾治辉

The Tendentiousness and Limit of the Expert Assistant in Criminal Procedure

  • Received:2013-11-18 Published:2014-01-15 Online:2014-02-13

被引次数

17

摘要： 刑事诉讼专家辅助人的倾向性，指专家辅助人帮助委托方参与刑事诉讼鉴定意见的质证、提出专家意见所体现的一种职业上的偏向。新《刑事诉讼法》及其司法解释并未明确专家辅助人的倾向性，不利于其属性的完整。因此，应当比较外国为平衡专家制度属性所进行的相关制度设计，定位我国刑事诉讼专家辅助人的“相对二元化倾向性”及其法律界限、科学界限、道德界限，以及这些界限的制度保障。

关键词: 刑事诉讼, 专家辅助人, 倾向性, 界限

Abstract: The tendentiousness of expert assistants in criminal procedure refers to a kind of inclination reflected in expert assistants when participating in the cross-examination of appraisal opinions in criminal procedure. The new Criminal Procedure Law and its judicial interpretation have not identified the tendentiousness of expert assistants and this is not good for expert assistants’ integrity. So we should compare the relevant foreign systems designed to balance expert assistants’ integrity, and position our expert assistants’ relative binary tendentiousness in criminal procedure and its limit of law, science and morality as well as the system guarantee thereof.

Key words: criminal procedure, expert assistant, tendentiousness, limit