专家辅助人出庭协助质证实务探讨

›› 2014 ›› Issue (1): 6-11.

专家辅助人出庭协助质证实务探讨

邹明理

西南政法大学司法鉴定中心

收稿日期:2013-07-26 修回日期:2013-08-22 出版日期:2014-01-15 发布日期:2014-02-13
通讯作者: 邹明理

The Cross-examination by the Expert Assistant in Court

Received:2013-07-26 Revised:2013-08-22 Published:2014-01-15 Online:2014-02-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为相关部门实施“两法”以及制定“专家辅助人出庭协助鉴定意见质证实施细则”提供参考资料，需要对“有专门知识的人”出庭就鉴定人的鉴定意见质证等六个亟待解决的实务问题进行探讨。“有专门知识的人”法律上不具有唯一性且未反映其身份和职责特点，宜更名为“专家辅助人”；对“专家辅助人”的条件和资格确认提出主张；探讨“专家辅助人”出庭质证规则的四个主要问题；对“专家辅助人”在法庭上向鉴定人提问的内容与方式和参加鉴定意见辩论应掌握的要点提出若干规范性建议；对“专家辅助人”法庭质证意见的性质与作用发表评论性意见，并认为专家辅助人应依法进行统一管理，建立以司法行政机关管理为主、人民法院管理为辅的两结合管理模式。

关键词: font-size: 10.5pt, mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt, mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">有专门知识的人；专家辅助人；鉴定意见质证

Abstract: In order for the implementation of the Civil and Criminal Procedure Laws, and to draft the implementation rules for the expert assistant appearing in court to assist cross-examination, there are some practical problems to be resolved. This paper suggests: the person with specialized knowledge should be renamed as the expert assistant, as the original term is not exclusive and does not reflect his identity and legal characteristics. The qualification of the expert assistant is proposed. Four main problems on cross-examination by the expert assistant in court are analyzed. Some suggestions are also given for the content and the way of questioning when the expert assistant cross-examines an appraisal expert. It gives comment on the nature and effect of the expert assistant’s opinions. The paper holds that the expert assistant should be regulated by judicial administrative organs supplemented by the people's courts.

Key words: people with specialized knowledge, expert assistant, cross-examination of expert opinion

邹明理. 专家辅助人出庭协助质证实务探讨[J]. , 2014(1): 6-11.

ZOU Ming-Li. The Cross-examination by the Expert Assistant in Court[J]. , 2014(1): 6-11.

[1]	杨小利. 庭审中心主义架构下专家辅助人制度实证研究——以医疗损害责任案件为切入点[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 10-19.
[2]	金雷霆, 李红. 论美国专家证言的采信规则[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 20-27.
[3]	张钦廷, 李豪喆, 陈琛, 刘超. 毒品所致精神障碍者刑事责任能力评定存在问题及对策[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 28-38.
[4]	赵琳琳, 翟仙敦, 郑哲, 李永林, 莫耀南. 我国嗜尸性蝇类分子鉴定的研究现状与分析[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 39-44.
[5]	李静, 花镇东, 王优美. 新型毒品THJ-018的体外代谢物及代谢途径[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 45-49.
[6]	安志远, 赵攀峰, 李聃, 周怀谷, 郭育林. SD大鼠死后心血中大肠杆菌DNA含量与早期死亡时间相关性的研究[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 50-55.
[7]	宋朝阳, 白晓峰. 利用三维立体显微镜判断笔画交叉时序探究[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 56-60.
[8]	刘全忠, 赵春梅, 佘晓欣, 刘力. 八种弹头遗留金属颗粒的成分分析[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 61-67.
[9]	周娟, 吕荫妮, 熊甜丽, 史晓凡. 黑色鞋带纤维种类的分析鉴别[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 68-71.
[10]	施晓玲. 法律共同体下司法鉴定的关联性因素—— 附三例报告[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 72-75.
[11]	孙大明, 诸宇杰. 司法鉴定执业风险识别与防控[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 76-80.
[12]	张德雨, 张纯兵, 宋孝飞, 雷兵, 张双双, 吴军. 老年人交通伤法医临床学鉴定[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 85-87.
[13]	吕凌, 林越坚. 高血压病暂予监外执行的评定[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 88-91.
[14]	曹安, 武文宽. 建设工程质量司法鉴定管理探讨[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 92-95.
[15]	党凌云, 张效礼. 2017年度全国司法鉴定情况统计分析[J]. , 2018, 98(3): 96-100.