主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2014 ›› Issue (2): 6-9.

• 鉴定制度 • 上一篇    下一篇

专家辅助人管理模式研究

赵杰   

  1. 南京师范大学法学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-01-06 出版日期:2014-03-15 发布日期:2014-03-31
  • 通讯作者: 赵杰

Study on the Management Model of Expert Assistant

  1. Nanjing normal university law school
  • Received:2014-01-06 Published:2014-03-15 Online:2014-03-31

摘要: 专家辅助人出庭质证制度正在悄悄改变现有的诉讼格局。通过专家出庭质证,改变了法庭对鉴定意见盲从的现状;但对专家辅助人监管的缺失使法律界人士担忧,其不仅违背法律对诉讼参与人应当监管的原则,也为该制度的正常适用埋下隐患。通过对专家辅助人是否应当管理、如何管理和怎样管理进行理论上的探讨,提出了当前阶段只适宜采用审判管理的建议。

关键词: font-size: 10.5pt, mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt, mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">专家辅助人;司法鉴定;管理模式

Abstract: The expert assistant appearing in court for testimony is quietly changing the existing litigation pattern. Through expert testimony, the phenomenon of courts’ blind reliance on expert opinions is changed. However, the legal profession is concerned about the lack of supervision upon the expert assistant, which is not only contrary to the principle of legal supervision on litigation participants, but is also a hidden danger to normal functioning of the system. Based on the discussion about the necessity and method of the expert assistant management, this article puts forward the suggestion that at current stage, it is only appropriate to carry out the management at the trial stage.

Key words: font-size: 10.5pt, mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA, mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体" lang="EN-US">expert assistant, forensic appraisal, management model