主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

›› 2014 ›› Issue (4): 10-16.

• 司法鉴定制度改革与实践专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

治理我国实践中司法鉴定失序的正途

郭华   

  1. 中央财经大学政法学院
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-24 出版日期:2014-07-15 发布日期:2014-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭华

The Right Way to Correct the Disorder of Forensic Appraisal in Chinese Judicial Practice

  • Received:2014-04-24 Published:2014-07-15 Online:2014-07-15

摘要: 司法鉴定制度作为司法制度的组成部分在诉讼中发挥着关键性的作用。然而,在我国司法实践中因相关职权履行不到位衍生了鉴定失序的现象,尤其是目前“诉讼掮客”引发的“鉴定黄牛”,更加剧了司法鉴定的乱象。由于理论对鉴定失序的原因研究不充分,司法实践对此现象分析的错位,在一定程度上干扰了司法鉴定制度改革的方向。基于此,深化司法鉴定制度改革更需要在强化司法行政有效管理和保障鉴定能力提高的基础上,更需要司法机关在实践中积极地扮演“第二守门员”的角色,履行鉴定启动决定权和鉴定使用选择权的控制职能,借助于鉴定人出庭作证来控制重复鉴定,同时还应通过保障当事人的鉴定权利使司法机关采纳鉴定意见获得可接受性,进而降低当事人重复鉴定的欲望,使司法实践中鉴定失序在正途中被不断纠正。

关键词: font-size: 10.5pt, mso-ascii-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-hansi-font-family: 'Times New Roman', mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA, mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'">职权规范;权利保障;鉴定失序

Abstract: The forensic appraisal system as a part of the judicial system plays a special role in litigations. However, in the juridical practice, the disorder of appraisal appeares because responsibilities of some organizations are not fulfilled. Especially, there exist “appraisal scalpers” triggered by “litigation brokers” nowadays, which even aggravates the chaos in the forensic appraisal system. Due to insufficient theoretical research on the disorder, the misplaced analysis of the judicial practice to this phenomenon has interfered with the direction of the reform of the forensic appraisal system to some extent. Based on this, deepening the reform of the?forensic appraisal system?needs to strengthen the administrative effectiveness and to improve the appraisal ability, and needs the court to play the role of “goalkeeper” actively in the practice and to perform the duties to control appraisal initiation and utilization of appraisal. With the help of the appraisers’ testimony in court, repeated appraisal can be controlled. Meanwhile, by securing the parties’ right to appraisal, appraisal opinions can be accepted by the court, so as to discourage the parties’ desire to appraisal repeatedly, and the disorder in judicial practice can be corrected.

Key words: