关键词: 法医临床学, 骨盆骨折, 伤残评定, 重新鉴定

Abstract: Objective To discuss how to correctly understand and use the assessing terms referring to pelvic fracture， and to establish scientific standards for forensic practice， by investigating controversial impairment assessment cases of pelvis fracture in traffic accidents and analyzing the problems in the primary assessments. Methods 65 impairment assessment cases of pelvic fracture in traffic accidents reappraised by Shanghai Forensic Appraisal Center from 2006 to 2013 were collected. The primary and reappraised opinions were analyzed and compared. Result The main problems of those primary appraisals， in which the expert opinions had been changed in the reappraisal， included inappropriate assessing time， insufficient materials and misunderstanding of the terms. Conclusion To improve the quality of pelvic fracture impairment assessment， the professional skills of forensic experts should be improved and a unified standard should be established.

Key words: clinical forensic science, pelvic fracture, impairment assessment, reappraisal