主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2011 ›› Issue (6): 6-10.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

论民事诉讼中专家辅助人的法律定位

赵 杰   

  1. 南京师范大学 法学院,江苏 南京 210046
  • 收稿日期:2011-07-11 出版日期:2011-11-15 发布日期:2022-07-29
  • 作者简介:赵杰(1962-),女,教授,硕士研究生导师,主要从事证据法学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

The Legal Status of Expert Auxiliary in Civil Litigation

ZHAO Jie   

  1. Law School of Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China
  • Received:2011-07-11 Published:2011-11-15 Online:2022-07-29

摘要: 司法鉴定意见在诉讼中占据重要的地位,但因鉴定意见具有较强的专业性,在法庭质证中普通人很难对其进行实质审查,虽然当事人可以聘请专家辅助人参与质证,但由于对专家辅助人的适用缺乏可操作规定,以至于严重影响这一制度的执行。如何发挥专家辅助人在鉴定意见质证中的作用,需要制定一套科学的程序来保障。

关键词: 专家辅助人, 鉴定意见, 质证, 民事诉讼

Abstract: Forensic appraisal opinions play an important role in litigations. Due to the strong specialty of appraisal opinions, it is difficult for ordinary people to cross-examine such opinions in trial. Although parties may hire expert auxiliary to participate in the cross-examination, the implementation of this system has been adversely influenced because of the lack of applicable regulations in this regard. A set of procedures should be established to guarantee the function of expert auxiliaries in the cross-examination of appraisal opinions.

Key words: expert auxiliary, appraisal opinion, cross-examination, civil litigation

中图分类号: