Abstract: The social defense function of compulsory psychotherapy procedure is restrained not only by the threat from the mental disease persons with limited criminal capacity and those who have received psychiatric treatment, but also from the passive compulsory psychotherapy. There are three ways to deal with these difficulties. Firstly, we should include the mental disease suspects with limited criminal capability into the coverage of non-voluntary psychotherapy according to the Mental Health Law. Secondly, the resources of mental disease treatment should be increased, and consciousness of the risks of applying and removing compulsory psychotherapy should be strengthened. Thirdly, we should stop all loopholes concerning the system of non-voluntary psychotherapy in the Mental Health Law to prevent new form of passive compulsory psychotherapy.

Key words: font-size: 10.5pt, mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA, mso-fareast-font-family: 宋体" lang="EN-US">compulsory psychotherapy, mental patient, criminal capacity, treatment, passive compulsory psychotherapy

摘要：  “强制医疗程序”的“社会防卫功能”，不仅受到限制刑事责任能力精神病人和接受过治疗精神病人社会危害性的抑制，还会因“被精神病”现象而打折扣。破解此困境需从三方面入手：一是参照《精神卫生法》，将涉嫌犯罪的限制刑事责任能力精神病人，纳入“非自愿性住院治疗”范围；二是增加精神病治疗资源投入，强化“强制医疗”适用与解除的风险防范意识；三是堵塞《精神卫生法》中“非自愿性住院治疗”的漏洞，防止其成为“被精神病”新生代的寄生区。

关键词: