Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2022 ›› Issue (3): 90-94.

Received:2019-12-12 Published:2022-05-15 Online:2022-06-17

论司法鉴定争议解决机制的完善

马陈骏¹，杜志淳²

1.上海公安学院，上海 200137； 2.华东政法大学，上海200042

通讯作者: 杜志淳（1954—），男，教授，博士研究生导师，主要从事司法鉴定制度与管理、司法制度研究。E-mail:duzhichun @ecupledu.cn
作者简介:马陈骏（1990—），男，讲师，博士，主要从事司法鉴定制度、物证技术研究。E-mail:daluma2005@163.com
基金资助:
十三五国家重点研发计划（2018YFC0830400）；国家哲学社会科学基金项目（18BFX082）。

Abstract

摘要： 现存的司法鉴定争议解决机制存在主体不专、针对性不强、缺乏协作等突出问题，以致当下相关部门处理鉴定争议多流于形式而难切中要害，从而引发“变相投诉”“报复性投诉”等现象层出不穷。在此背景下，为保障公民合法救济权与司法鉴定服务平台的正常秩序，提高审判机构对鉴定意见的采信与适用效率。司法鉴定争议解决法律路径的完善必须从权责分明、合理分权、多方协作等方面着手，建立以司法鉴定行政管理与行业管理二元结构框架下，聚焦鉴定投诉或诉讼根本诉求的运行机制，并以此为圭臬开展司法鉴定争议解决相关活动，维护司法公正与社会稳定。

关键词: , 司法鉴定争议；鉴定投诉；行业协会

CLC Number:

马陈骏, 杜志淳. 论司法鉴定争议解决机制的完善[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2022(3): 90-94.

[1]	WANG Minyuan, LI Jia. Analysis on the Dual Structure of Forensic Appraisal Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 1-11.
[2]	DU Zhichun, SHEN Zhenyi. Research on Major Issues Involved in the Legislation of Forensic Appraisal in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 12-17.
[3]	BAI Rongjing. Normative Analysis and Procedural Improvement of Supervision and Appraisal Legislation ——Using the Forensic Appraisal System as a Reference [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 18-27.
[4]	HE Xiaodan, YANG Xu, The Delegation from the Academy of Forensic Science to Australia. Where to from Here——Overview of the 23rd Triennial Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 28-35.
[5]	QIAO Fang’e. Introspection and Reconstruction of Self-commissioned Appraisal Opinion [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 82-90.
[6]	DONG Chunhua. Challenges on the Viewpoint on Replacement of Litigation by Forensic Appraisal in Liability of Medical Damages [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 91-98.
[7]	Public Legal Service Administration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice. Statistical Analysis Report of National Forensic Appraisal in 2022 [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 107-110.
[8]	YU Xun. Research on the Key Issues of Environmental Damage Forensic Appraisal [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(6): 86-90.
[9]	GUO Hua. The Multidimensional Perspective and Nature Definition of Forensic Appraisal Legislation [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 1-9.
[10]	ZHU Jinfeng. Outline of Several Issues on Forensic Appraisal Management under the Public Welfare Attribute [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 10-21.
[11]	LI Kun. Online Appraisal: Normative Construction and Institutional Deployment—Centered on Article 28 of the Online Operating Rules of the People’s Court [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 81-90.
[12]	CUI Hengchun, LI Qin. Several Issues Concerning the Entrustment of Forensic Appraisal by Prosecutors in Public Interest Litigations [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 91-94.
[13]	ZHOU Xue, LIANG Qian, YU Shanshan, et al.. Discussion on the Risk Fund System for Forensic Appraisal Practice [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 95-99.
[14]	TAO Yijun, DU Zhichun. Discussion on the Role of Handwriting Experts Testifying in Court as Expert Assistants [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 100-104.
[15]	ZHANG Dong, HAN Zhuowei. The Path of Procuratorial Supervision on the Identification of Death Cause in the Event of Regulatory Place Death [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(4): 1-9.

论司法鉴定争议解决机制的完善

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics