Abstract:

The hearing system has been relatively well built up in the legislation and administrative work. In recent years, we have tried to use the hearing system to solve some problems in judicial appraisal practice, such as in intellectual property, medical malpractice, forensic accounting, and forensic psychiatric identification cases. Besides, the academia has paid attention and carried out research on this issue. The research mainly relates to the value and scope of the system, the initiation and determination of the participants， the presiding person of the hearing, and the design of the procedural rules. There are still a lot of controversies and problems at present. The article intends to research the hearing system regarding judicial appraisal. With this intention, it first discusses the legal basis and the value of the hearing system regarding judicial appraisal, and then puts forward solutions to the responsibility for the authenticity of the supplementary materials, the initiation, time selection, and determination of hearing participants.

Key words: forensic appraisal hearing system, administrative hearing system

摘要：

听证制度在国家立法和行政工作中已取得较为完善的构建。近些年来，在鉴定实务中，如知识产权、医疗纠纷、司法精神病鉴定、司法会计鉴定等鉴定领域，也已经试用听证来解决一些难题。学界也对司法鉴定听证进行关注、研究，主要涉及鉴定听证的制度价值、适用范围、启动、听证参与人的确定、主持人的选任、听证程序规则设计等方面，但当下仍存在诸多争议和问题。对司法鉴定听证制度进行研究，论证司法鉴定听证的法律依据、制度价值，在此基础上提出司法鉴定听证在补充收集材料真实性的责任承担主体、启动、时间选择、参与人的确定等问题上的解决路径。

关键词: 司法鉴定听证制度, 行政听证制度