Abstract:

In recent years， there arise more and more disability assessments of intellective defects and mental disorders caused by traffic accidents. As a result of non-standard operations in the practice， the inconsistence of assessment conclusions occurs frequently， which harms the assessment quality and affects disputes resolution regarding traffic accident compensation. So far， the qualification of some assessment bodies and their examiners has been questioned by traffic management departments， and has also drawn the attention of forensic identification administration sectors. With the aim to provide some ideas on the operational standardization of mental disability assessment， this article discusses the topic associated with the qualification for mental disability assessment from two aspects： procedures and technical operations.

Key words: forensic psychiatry, forensic medicine, mental disability, brain injury, road traffic accident, assessment

摘要：

近年来，交通伤后遗智力缺损或精神障碍伤残评定日益增多，实际评残操作不规范，造成鉴定意见不一致经常发生，影响鉴定质量和交通事故处理。当前，部分鉴定机构及其鉴定人的资质问题已经受到交通事故处理机关的质疑，也引起司法鉴定管理部门的关注。对此，就精神伤残评定资质问题从程序规定角度和技术操作层面展开讨论，力图为精神伤残评定的规范操作提供一些思路。

关键词: 司法精神医学, 法医学, 精神伤残, 脑损伤, 道路交通事故, 评定