Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2012 ›› Issue (5): 108-111.

Received:2011-12-03 Published:2012-09-15 Online:2022-07-26

论我国刑事鉴定意见审查判断权的实现

吴常青1，2，王彪3

1．天津商业大学法学院，天津 300134； 2.西南政法大学，重庆 400031； 3.重庆市渝中区人民法院，重庆 400031

作者简介:吴常青（1979—），男，讲师，博士研究生。主要从事诉讼法学、司法制度研究。
基金资助:
天津市哲学社会科学研究规划项目（TJFX11-017）

Abstract

摘要：

法官对鉴定意见的审查判断是裁判权的重要内容。而我国司法实践中，法官对鉴定意见的审查判断往往流于形式，鉴定意见的采信率极高。其主要原因在于：鉴定意见基本由侦查机关内设的鉴定机构作出，法官难以触及鉴定过程、法官鉴定意见实质性审查判断能力不足，以及公检法一体化司法体制使得法官往往忽视对鉴定意见的审查。鉴定意见审查判断权的实现除需要分离侦查机关内设的鉴定机构、逐步完善专家辅助人制度和建立专家陪审员制度外，还有赖于司法逐步走向独立。

关键词: 鉴定意见, 审查判断权, 司法独立

CLC Number:

DF73
DF8

吴常青, 王彪. 论我国刑事鉴定意见审查判断权的实现 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2012(5): 108-111.

[1]	XIE Bugao. Empirical Analysis and Control Regarding Scientific Evidence in Misjudged Criminal Cases [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, 113(6): 1-9.
[2]	. Dilemma and Outlet of the technical evidence audit [J]. , 2013, 70(5): 86-89.
[3]	WANG Min-yuan. On the Improvement of the Forensic Appraisal System after the Revision #br# of the Criminal Procedure Law#br# —An Analysis Based on the Value and Characteristics of Forensic Appraisal#br# [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013, 69(4): 1-5.
[4]	CHANG Lin, LI Su-lin. On the Key Issues Regarding the Expert Assistant System in Criminal Procedure [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013, 69(4): 6-12.
[5]	BIAN Jian-lin, GUO Zhi-yuan. Progress of the Forensic Appraisal System in the New Criminal Procedural Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 62(3): 10-13.
[6]	WU Gao-qing, QI Pei-jun. The Perfection of the System Regarding Persons with Expertise — On Article 192 of the New Criminal Procedural Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 62(3): 14-18.
[7]	CHEN Guang-zhong, LV Ze-hua. New Developments and New Expectations of the System of Criminal Judicial Appraisal in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 61(2): 1-51.
[8]	WANG Jun-min. The Legislative Position of the Consequence of Appraisers’ Refusing to Testify in Trial [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 61(2): 6-111.
[9]	. Seize Opportunities， Face Challenges and Seek for Development —Changes on the Forensic Appraisal Conclusion in “Criminal Procedural Law Amendment （Draft）” [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 60(1): 4-7.
[10]	DAI Yu-zhong. Some Key Issues Regarding the Improvement of the Criminal Appraisal System [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 59(6): 1-5.
[11]	LU Jian-jun. The System Construction for Expert Auxiliary in Criminal Litigation [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 59(6): 11-14.
[12]	. [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 57(4): 72-75.

论我国刑事鉴定意见审查判断权的实现

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 12

Recommended Articles

Metrics