Loading...
主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

Archive

    2018 Issue 1 (Total No. )
    Published: 15 January 2018
    Previous Issue    Next Issue

    For Selected: Toggle Thumbnails

    Reform and Development of Judicial Appraisal in the New Era

    2018(1): 1-5. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (679KB) ( )  
    Forensic appraisal is an important component of litigation activities and plays an important role in ensuring judicial fairness. For the supervision of judicial appraisal, there exist some problems, such as lenient supervision for entry into the business and the unsatisfactory overall development of the forensic industry. We should further improve the unified management system of forensic appraisal. In the meantime, the image of forensic industry should be constantly upgraded by the measures of strict control of access, strict supervision survival of the fittest, comprehensive policy enforcement and enhancing supervision. As for the forensic science and technology capabilities, we must improve and make perfect the system of institutions, judicial appraisal institutions should increase input; judicial appraisers should effectively improve the professional and technical capabilities. Finally, we must continue to push forward the high-quality development of judicial appraisal in the new era, including strengthening the construction of judicial appraisers associations, promoting the implementation of classified management, establishing a batch of key laboratories, strengthening the construction of a public legal service platform for forensic appraisal.
    Related Articles | Metrics

    Study on Legal Regulation of Judicial Expertise from the Perspective of OthersForensic Expertise

    LIU Ke-yi
    2018(1): 6-11. 
    Abstract ( )   PDF (868KB) ( )  

    Abstract: “Others” forensic expertise is significantly different from the types of forensic medicine, forensic physical evidence and forensic audio/video in many aspects, such as the legitimacy of the use of appraisal, the choice of appraisal standards, authenticity and completeness of appraisal materials, as well as the determination of the legitimacy of obtaining the materials, etc., which are legal issues closely related to value judgment. We should take different regulations towards the categories, let judges, the parties effectively participate in the “other type” forensic appraisal process, so that the judges’ authority to hear a case and the parties’ litigation right can balance against the right of the appraisers,and may improve the objectiveness,reliability, acceptability of the appraisal opinions,effectively reduce supplementary appraisal or  re-appraisal. In this way, the cost of appraisal can be reduced and the efficiency improved,thus promoting the fair and quick resolution of disputes.

    Related Articles | Metrics