关键词: 司法鉴定行业管理, “两结合”管理制度, “四大类”鉴定, 会员管理

Abstract: Although current Chinese legislation provides for a “Dual-Combination” management system (integrating administrative and industry self-regulation) in forensic appraisal, it does not compel forensic appraisal institutions to join forensic appraisal associations. In practice, some institutions operating in the “Four Major Categories” of forensic appraisal remain outside these associations, thereby evading industry self-regulation and creating a gap in the self-regulatory part of the “Dual-Combination” model. By examining data and materials from non-member “Four Major Categories” institutions in S City, this study identifies that these non-member entities are typically small-scale, under-resourced, and operationally weak. Their reluctance to join often stems from an intend to avoid oversight or hconcerns over membership fees. To achieve comprehensive coverage and effective industry self-regulation for all “Four Major Categories” institutions, it is imperative to attract non-members through measures such as specialized legislation and optimized association functions. This approach would expand the association’s services and supervisory reach, thereby strengthening the “Dual-Combination” management system.

Key words: forensic appraisal industry management, “Dual-Combination” management system, “Four Major Categories” of appraisal, membership management