主管：中华人民共和国司法部
主办：司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N
中国司法鉴定

中国司法鉴定 ›› 2026 ›› Issue (3): 75-83.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2026.03.008

• 鉴定论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

公共法律服务与司法鉴定融合发展的多维路径建构

张静茹1，张　钊2 ，秦冠英2   

  1. 1.中南财经政法大学 刑事司法学院；
    2.甘肃政法大学 司法警察学院（公安分院）
  • 出版日期:2026-05-15 发布日期:2026-05-19

Multidimensional Path Construction for Integrated Development of  Public Legal Services and Forensic Appraisal

ZHANG Jingru1, ZHANG Zhao2, QIN Guanying2   

  1. 1. Criminal Justice School, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law; 2. College of Judicial Police (Public Security Branch), Gansu University of Political Science and Law
  • Published:2026-05-15 Online:2026-05-19

PDF

摘要： 在国家治理现代化与法治中国建设深入推进的背景下，公共法律服务体系建设与司法鉴定制度改革面临高质量发展的时代要求。公共法律服务的“普惠均等”价值目标与司法鉴定的“科学公正”技术理性，共同构成了社会正义实现的二元支柱。从法哲学视角审视，罗尔斯的程序正义理论要求司法资源分配必须保障最不利者的最大利益，而哈贝马斯的交往行为理论则强调制度系统间需通过理性沟通实现协同。当前，随着《法律援助法》的实施与司法部《公共法律服务规范提升三年行动方案（2025—2027年）》的推进，二者融合已成为回应人民群众对实质正义期待的必然。然而，实践中存在体制机制壁垒、技术标准割裂与资源分布失衡等深层次的矛盾，亟需从法哲学基础与跨学科整合层面探索系统性解决方案。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 公共法律服务, 融合发展, 跨学科

Abstract: In the context of advancing the modernization of national governance and the construction of a rule-of-law China, the development of public legal service systems and reforms in forensic appraisal face the requirements of high-quality development. The value goal of “universal and equal” public legal services and the technical rationality of “scientific and fair” forensic appraisal together form the dual pillars of social justice. From a legal philosophy perspective, Rawls’ theory of procedural justice requires that the allocation of judicial resources must ensure the maximum benefit for the least advantaged, while Habermas’ theory of communicative action emphasizes the need for rational communication among institutional systems to achieve synergy. Currently, with the implementation of the Legal Aid Law and the advancement of the Ministry of Justice’s Three-Year Action Plan for Improving Public Legal Service Standards (2025-2027), the integration of these two aspects has become essential to meet the people’s expectations for substantive justice. However, practical challenges such as institutional barriers, fragmented technical standards, and imbalanced resource distribution remain, necessitating systematic solutions from the perspectives of legal philosophy and interdisciplinary integration.

Key words: forensic appraisal, public legal services, integrated development, interdisciplinary

中图分类号: