Effects of the Region and Amount of Fingerprint Minutiae on the Evaluation of Likelihood Ratio
LI Kang1, 2, LUO Yaping1
1. College of Investigation, People’s Public Security University of China, Beijing 100038, China;
2. Department of Forensic Science, Zhejiang Police College, Hangzhou 310053, China
LI Kang, LUO Yaping. Effects of the Region and Amount of Fingerprint Minutiae on the Evaluation of Likelihood Ratio[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024(1): 66-73.
[1] 张翠玲, 谭铁君. 基于贝叶斯统计推理的法庭证据评价[J]. 刑事技术, 2018,43(4): 265-271.
[2] MORRISON G S. Distinguishing between forensic science and forensic pseudoscience: testing of validity and reliability, and approaches to forensic voice comparison[J]. Science & Justice, 2014,54(3): 245-256.
[3] OWEN E F, ROGER J D. Expressing evaluative opinions: a position statement[J]. Science & Justice, 2011,51(4): 212.
[4] BERGER C E H, BUCKLETON J, CHAMPOD C, et al. Evidence evaluation: a response to the court of appeal judgment in R v T[J]. Science & Justice, 2011,51(2): 43-49.
[5] ALBERINK I, JONGH A D, RODRIGUEZ C. Fingermark evidence evaluation based on automated fingerprint identification system matching scores: the effect of different types of conditioning on likelihood ratios[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2014,59(1): 70-81.
[6] BUNCH S, WEVERS G. Application of likelihood ratios for firearm and toolmark analysis[J]. Science & Justice, 2013,53(2): 223-229.
[7] BACHRACH B, JAIN A, JUNG S, et al. A statistical validation of the individuality and repeatability of striated tool marks: screwdrivers and tongue and groove pliers?[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2010,55(2): 348-357.
[8] SHARMA V, BAINS M, VERMA R, et al. Novel use of logistic regression and likelihood ratios for the estimation of gender of the writer from a database of handwriting features[J]. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023,55(1): 89-106.
[9] WYDRA J, MATUSZEWSKI S. Likelihood ratio to evaluate handwriting evidence using similarity index[J]. Law, Probability and Risk, 2022,21(1): 21-42.
[10] CHEN X H, CHAMPOD C, YANG X, et al. Assessment of signature handwriting evidence via score-based likelihood ratio based on comparative measurement of relevant dynamic features[J]. Forensic Science International, 2018,282: 101-110.
[11] PUCH-SOLIS R, POPE S, EVETT I. Calculating likelihood ratios for a mixed DNA profile when a contribution from a genetic relative of a suspect is proposed[J]. Science & Justice, 2010,50(4): 205-209.
[12] MICHALSKA A, MARTYNA A, ZADORA G. Investigation of various factors influencing Raman spectra interpretation with the use of likelihood ratio approach[J]. Forensic Science International, 2018,282: 60-73.
[13] ALLEN R J. Exact solutions to Bayesian and maximum likelihood problems in facial identification when population and error distributions are known[J]. Forensic Science International, 2008,179(2/3): 211-218.
[14] ISHIHARA S. Strength of linguistic text evidence: A fused forensic text comparison system[J]. Forensic Science International, 2017,278: 184-197.
[15] LEEGWATER A J, MEUWLY D, SJERPS M, et al. Performance study of a score-based likelihood ratio system for forensic fingermark comparison[J]. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2017,62(3): 626-640.
[16] European Network of Forensic Science Institutes. ENFSI guideline for evaluative reporting in forensic science[R]. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2015:6-29.
[17] European Fingerprint Working Group. Best practice manual for fingerprint examination[R].[S.l]:European Network of Forensic Science Institutes,2015:4-57.
[18] Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science. Standard for Friction Ridge Examination Conclusions
[S/OL]. [2023-09-17].https: //www.nist.gov/system/files/documents/2020/03/23/OSAC%20FRS%20CONCLUSIONS%
20Document%20Template%202020_Final.pdf.
[19] HOLDREN J P, LANDER E S, PRESS W, et al. Forensic science in criminal courts: Ensuring scientific validity of feature-comparison methods[R]. [S.l.]:President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2016.
[20] National Research Council. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward[M]. Washington, D.C., USA: National Academies Press, 2009: 43.