Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2013 ›› Issue (4): 97-107.

Received:2013-05-17 Published:2013-07-15 Online:2022-07-11

专家证人“入席”进路及司法可终裁性思辨

王平荣1，2，卜泳生3

1.河海大学商学院，江苏南京 210098； 2.苏州市中级人民法院，江苏苏州 215007； 3.苏州市行政学院，江苏苏州 215001

作者简介:王平荣（1967-），男，高级法官，博士，主要从事司法鉴定制度研究。

Abstract

摘要：

我国三大诉讼法的相继修订为设立专家证人“入席”制度的争辩划上句号。全球信息化时代要求更多体现竞争公平与机会公平，强化法治方式下解决矛盾纠纷路径选择的程序正义，赋予当事人以看得见的方式实现公正的全新生命力。由专家证人参与的证据展示给人们带来规则的确定性及结果可预见性。专家证人意见的采纳使得司法裁决终局获得更多社会认同，专家证人制度也因此得到更多社会心理支持。

关键词: 专家证人, 制度设计, 法治方式, 司法终裁

CLC Number:

王平荣, 卜泳生. 专家证人“入席”进路及司法可终裁性思辨 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2013(4): 97-107.

[1]	WANG Minyuan, LI Jia. Analysis on the Dual Structure of Forensic Appraisal Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 1-11.
[2]	DU Zhichun, SHEN Zhenyi. Research on Major Issues Involved in the Legislation of Forensic Appraisal in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 12-17.
[3]	BAI Rongjing. Normative Analysis and Procedural Improvement of Supervision and Appraisal Legislation ——Using the Forensic Appraisal System as a Reference [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 18-27.
[4]	HE Xiaodan, YANG Xu, The Delegation from the Academy of Forensic Science to Australia. Where to from Here——Overview of the 23rd Triennial Meeting of the International Association of Forensic Sciences [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 28-35.
[5]	QIAO Fang’e. Introspection and Reconstruction of Self-commissioned Appraisal Opinion [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 82-90.
[6]	DONG Chunhua. Challenges on the Viewpoint on Replacement of Litigation by Forensic Appraisal in Liability of Medical Damages [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 91-98.
[7]	Public Legal Service Administration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice. Statistical Analysis Report of National Forensic Appraisal in 2022 [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 107-110.
[8]	YU Xun. Research on the Key Issues of Environmental Damage Forensic Appraisal [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(6): 86-90.
[9]	GUO Hua. The Multidimensional Perspective and Nature Definition of Forensic Appraisal Legislation [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 1-9.
[10]	ZHU Jinfeng. Outline of Several Issues on Forensic Appraisal Management under the Public Welfare Attribute [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 10-21.
[11]	LI Kun. Online Appraisal: Normative Construction and Institutional Deployment—Centered on Article 28 of the Online Operating Rules of the People’s Court [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 81-90.
[12]	CUI Hengchun, LI Qin. Several Issues Concerning the Entrustment of Forensic Appraisal by Prosecutors in Public Interest Litigations [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 91-94.
[13]	ZHOU Xue, LIANG Qian, YU Shanshan, et al.. Discussion on the Risk Fund System for Forensic Appraisal Practice [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 95-99.
[14]	TAO Yijun, DU Zhichun. Discussion on the Role of Handwriting Experts Testifying in Court as Expert Assistants [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(5): 100-104.
[15]	ZHANG Dong, HAN Zhuowei. The Path of Procuratorial Supervision on the Identification of Death Cause in the Event of Regulatory Place Death [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(4): 1-9.

专家证人“入席”进路及司法可终裁性思辨

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics