Construction of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism for Appraisal of Death Cause before Filing Criminal Cases

Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2019 ›› Issue (2): 1-5.

Received:2018-11-03 Published:2019-03-15 Online:2019-03-15

刑事立案前死因鉴定争议解决机制建构

邢文博^1，2,杜志淳¹

1.华东政法大学，上海 200042； 2.南京森林警察学院刑事科学技术学院，江苏南京 210046

通讯作者: 邢文博

Abstract

摘要： 在侦查机关根据本部门鉴定机构出具的死因鉴定意见而决定不予立案的案事件中，死者家属对鉴定意见有异议时，因为案件没有进入诉讼程序，所以没有通过审判程序解决对鉴定意见争议的机制，致使死者家属的诉求没有正常的解决渠道。为了得到死者死亡真相，促使相关公权力机关介入调查，死者家属通过上访、闹事，甚至引发社会性事件来寻求社会的关注。在我国刑事诉讼中建构刑事诉讼立案前司法鉴定意见争议解决机制，给予公民充分的参与权，可化解对刑事诉讼立案前鉴定意见的争议，维护社会的公平、正义、稳定。

关键词: 刑事诉讼, 死因鉴定, 司法鉴定, 侦查监督

CLC Number:

DF73
DF94

邢文博杜志淳. 刑事立案前死因鉴定争议解决机制建构[J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2019(2): 1-5.

[1]	. Research on the Identification Issues in Compulsory Medical Procedures [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 0(4): 90-94.
[2]	FU Shujun, PIAO Zonggen. Operation Status and Improvement Path of Expert Assistant System— Empirical Study Based on the Trial Implementation of “Court Investigation Procedure” [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 0(4): 100-106.
[3]	LI Zhenlin. The Criminal Regulations of the Act of Fraud Insurance by False Identification of Disability [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 0(3): 1-9.
[4]	WEN Yunyun. On the Independence of Criminal Forensic Appraisal in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 0(3): 95-98.
[5]	PEI Jingjing. An Empirical Study on Defendant's Application for Reappraisal of Judicial Status — Based on the Driminal Judgement Documents of the National Courts in 2019 [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 0(1): 78-82.
[6]	XIE Bugao. Empirical Analysis and Control Regarding Scientific Evidence in Misjudged Criminal Cases [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, 0(6): 1-9.
[7]	XIA Fei. The Scientific Development of Forensic Science Evidence in Criminal Cases — from the Perspective of the Development of Forensic Science in the USA [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, 0(4): 1-8.
[8]	. [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2019, 0(5): 69-73.
[9]	. [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2019, 0(1): 8-12.
[10]	. Dilemma and Outlet of the technical evidence audit [J]. , 2013, 0(5): 86-89.
[11]	WANG Min-yuan. On the Improvement of the Forensic Appraisal System after the Revision #br# of the Criminal Procedure Law#br# —An Analysis Based on the Value and Characteristics of Forensic Appraisal#br# [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013, 0(4): 1-5.
[12]	CHANG Lin, LI Su-lin. On the Key Issues Regarding the Expert Assistant System in Criminal Procedure [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2013, 0(4): 6-12.
[13]	. On the Electronic Evidence in Criminal Procedure [J]. , 2013, 0(2): 80-86.
[14]	LI Xue-jun, ZHU Meng-ni. Analyses of the Appraisal System Regulated by the Amended Criminal Procedure Law and Civil Procedure Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 0(6): 7-12.
[15]	. [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 0(5): 108-111.

Construction of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism for Appraisal of Death Cause before Filing Criminal Cases

刑事立案前死因鉴定争议解决机制建构

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics