Abstract: The forensic appraisal opinion is the individual understanding and judgment by a forensic appraiser regarding special issues involved in the litigation. It is restricted not only by the objective factors such as instrument and equipment, the identification method and laboratory conditions, but also by the limitation of the appraiser’s knowledge, ability and experience of practice. Therefore, for the same special issues, different appraisal opinions might appear, and its reliability and scientific nature are inevitably questioned by the parties. This article discusses the attribute of forensic appraisal, the trial practice for its actionability, jurisprudential analysis and our country’s current regulations regarding the actionability of some legal activities to find out the answer of whether the forensic appraisal opinion is actionable, and the dispute settlement mechanism thereof.

Key words:  forensic appraisal, dispute, controversy, settlement mechanism

摘要： 司法鉴定意见是司法鉴定人对诉讼涉及的专门性问题的个人认识和判断，不仅受到仪器设备、鉴定方法以及实验室条件等客观因素的制约，也会受到司法鉴定人的知识水平、业务能力和实践经验等主观因素的影响。因而，对于同一专门性问题可能会出现不同的鉴定意见，其可靠性和科学性也无可避免会受到当事人的质疑。通过对司法鉴定的属性、可诉性的审判实践、法理上的分析以及我国现行法律对一些法律行为的可诉性规定等方面进行探讨，以寻找司法鉴定意见是否可诉的答案以及司法鉴定意见争议的解决机制。

关键词: