Rules of Admissibility of Appraisal Opinions

Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2011 ›› Issue (2): 1-5.

Rules of Admissibility of Appraisal Opinions

ZHANG Li-ming

Law school, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2010-10-26 Published:2011-03-15 Online:2022-07-22

构建鉴定意见的证据能力规则体系

章礼明

广州大学公法研究中心，广州大学法学院，广东广州510006

作者简介:章礼明（1965-），男，教授。主要研究刑事诉讼法学、证据法学、司法制度。 
基金资助:
全国哲学社科规划办资助项目（10BFX056）；广州市教育局资助项目（09AC012）

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on different values, admissibility as evidence of appraisal opinions can be divided into types of substantive reality and procedural justice. Analyzing the existing relevant rules of evidence with the theoretical framework, we find that there are some flaws. Therefore, this paper designs the systematic rules of admissibility as evidence of appraisal opinions.

Key words: appraisal opinion, admissibility, substantive reality, procedural justice

摘要：

依据价值取向的不同，鉴定意见的证据能力规则可以分为实体真实型和程序正当型两类。以此为理论框架分析现有的相关证据规则，我们发现存在一些缺陷。基于此，本文提出建立我国鉴定意见的证据能力规则体系的构想。

关键词: 鉴定意见, 证据能力, 实体真实, 程序正当

CLC Number:

ZHANG Li-ming. Rules of Admissibility of Appraisal Opinions [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011(2): 1-5.

章礼明. 构建鉴定意见的证据能力规则体系 [J]. 中国司法鉴定, 2011(2): 1-5.

[1]	DONG Chunhua. Challenges on the Viewpoint on Replacement of Litigation by Forensic Appraisal in Liability of Medical Damages [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2024, 0(1): 91-98.
[2]	ZHU Mengni. The Reflection and Reformation of Legal Status of Specialized Review of Technical Evidence [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(6): 23-30.
[3]	XI Fei. Rethinking and Solution to the Practice of “Substituting Trial by Appraisal” [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(4): 10-18.
[4]	. Development of the Evaluation Methods for Fingerprint Evidence: From Experience to Science [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 0(4): 38-44.
[5]	WANG Xu, ZHANG Mingrui, . Study on the Reliability of Forensic Science / Forensic Appraisal Opinions [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 128(3): 1-8.
[6]	ZHANG Baosheng, DONG Shuai. Research on the Reliability of Appraisal Opinions [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 128(3): 9-20.
[7]	WU Hongqi, CHENG Xiaoai. The Legal Expression of the Standard of Reliability of Appraisal Opinions: From the Perceptive of Comparative Law [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2023, 128(3): 29-35.
[8]	CHEN Xianyu. Problems and Countermeasures of Revocation of Appraisal Opinions by Appraisers— The Empirical Analysis of Revocation of Appraisal Opinions in 63 Civil Cases [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 124(5): 10-16.
[9]	CAO Jia, CHEN Xiaoyong. On the Conceptual Dimensions and Evaluation Paradigms of Scientific Evidence— From the Perspectives of Law and Philosophy [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 123(4): 1-11.
[10]	CHAI Yongwang. The Deconstruction on the Adoption Rule of Expert Appraisal Opinion — based on the Instructive Cases No. 92 and No. 100 of Protection of New Varieties of Plants [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 122(3): 18-23.
[11]	ZHAO Jie. Revocation of Forensic Appraisal Opinion— from the Perspective of Expert Opinion Error Correction [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 121(2): 8-15.
[12]	CHEN Xianyu. Research on the Examination System of Technical Evidence in Procuratorate Organs [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 120(1): 17-29.
[13]	WANG Canfa, ZHANG Tianze. Research on the Probative Power of Appraisal Opinions and Expert Opinions in Environmental Litigation [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 118(5): 47-54.
[14]	ZHU Jinfeng, WU Hejian. Reflection on the Credibility of Forensic Appraisal and Choice of Resolving System Mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 118(5): 32-46.
[15]	TIAN Yiyao, ZHAO Shen. Legal Nature of Forensic Appraiser and Their Appraisal Opinion— Analysis Based on the New Provisions on Civil Evidence [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 117(4): 10-20.