Abstract:

No remarkable changes have taken place in cross-examination of forensic appraisal since the implementation of the “Decision on the Administration of Forensic Appraisal”. The problems still remain where appraisers do not appear in court and the cross-examination is merely a formality. From a macroscopic view， it is a problem of the procedure system； from a microscopic view， it arises from the defects of the cross-examination system. To resolve these problems， the system of discovery and cross-examination should be built in the litigation procedure. The compulsory appearance with clear unfavorable consequences against challenged for key appraisal opinions， the rules of cross-examination， and the expert assistant system should also be established in law.

Key words: forensic appraisal, appraisal opinion, cross-examination

摘要：

我国司法鉴定质证程序自《关于司法鉴定管理问题的决定》颁布后并没有显著改变，鉴定人不出庭和对鉴定意见质证流于形式的问题仍然存在。究其原因，从宏观上看是诉讼制度的问题，从微观上看是鉴定意见质证本身的缺陷。解决这一问题，在宏观上应当在诉讼程序中建立和完善证据开示制度、交叉询问制度；在微观上应建立异议和关键鉴定意见强制出庭制度，明确不出庭的后果，规范质证规则和内容，并建立专家辅助人制度。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 鉴定意见, 质证