On the Basic Features of Forensic Appraisal Conclusion

Abstract

Abstract: Basic features of forensic appraisal conclusions are analyzed with the point of view that appraisal conclusions have both the features of scientific evidence and legal evidence. Based on this, the making of forensic clinical examination reports is discussed in the light of problems in the present examination reports.

Key words: forensic appraisal conclusion, scientific evidence, examination report

摘要： 本文分析司法鉴定意见的基本属性,认为其同时具备科学证据以及证据学的特征属性,在此基础上针对法医学鉴定文书存在的问题,就法医学鉴定文书的制作方法进行探讨。

关键词: 司法鉴定意见, 科学证据, 鉴定文书

ZHU Guang-you (Institute of Forensic Science;Ministry of Justice;Shanghai 000;China). On the Basic Features of Forensic Appraisal Conclusion[J]. , 2008(04): 1-6+25.

朱广友;. 论司法鉴定意见的基本属性[J]. , 2008(04): 1-6+25.

[1]	CAO Jia, CHEN Xiaoyong. On the Conceptual Dimensions and Evaluation Paradigms of Scientific Evidence— From the Perspectives of Law and Philosophy [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 123(4): 1-11.
[2]	CHAI Yongwang. The Deconstruction on the Adoption Rule of Expert Appraisal Opinion — based on the Instructive Cases No. 92 and No. 100 of Protection of New Varieties of Plants [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2022, 122(3): 18-23.
[3]	WANG Xu, CHEN Jun. Compliance Management and Standardization: Building the Credibility of Forensic Appraisal in the Era of Scientific Evidence [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 119(6): 1-9.
[4]	ZHOU Guixue, ZHOU Shi, TU Shun. The System of Quality Control Measures in Forensic Science and Perspective on Domestic Practice [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2021, 116(3): 21-35.
[5]	XIE Bugao. Empirical Analysis and Control Regarding Scientific Evidence in Misjudged Criminal Cases [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, 113(6): 1-9.
[6]	. Seize Opportunities， Face Challenges and Seek for Development —Changes on the Forensic Appraisal Conclusion in “Criminal Procedural Law Amendment （Draft）” [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2012, 60(1): 4-7.
[7]	FENG Zheng-zheng. On the Scientific Evidence Admissibility #br# —Rethinking from the Perspective of“Cognition” Against “Evaluation”#br# [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 59(6): 65-71.
[8]	LIU Jian-hua. A Fetish of Expert Evidence Is not Rational [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 58(5): 15-18.
[9]	DU Zhi-chun, LIAO Gen-wei. Comparative Analysis of the Concepts of Digital Evidence， Electronic Evidence， Scientific Evidence and Electronic Records [J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011, 57(4): 64-68.
[10]	LIU Jian-hua(Public Security College;Zhongnan University of Economics and Law;Wuhan 00;China). On the Language Characters of the Unity of Opposites in Forensic Examination Reports [J]. , 2009, 0(02): 55-58.
[11]	XU Jing-cun;YAN Fei(Law School;Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Chongqing 000;China). Fill the Knowledge Gap by Improving the Procedure——On Dealing with Challenges Raised by Scientific Evidence [J]. , 2009, 0(02): 1-6.
[12]	WANG Shi-fan(High People's Court of Gansu Province;Lanzhou 000;China). The Examination and Determination of Force of Forensic Appraisal Conclusions [J]. , 2007, 0(03): 14-18.
[13]	HE Jia-hong LIU Hao-yang (Chinese people's University Public Security Bureau;Civil Ariatiu Burean of China). Reform of forensic authentication system is necessary in the era of scientific evidence [J]. , 2001, 0(01): 26-28.

On the Basic Features of Forensic Appraisal Conclusion

论司法鉴定意见的基本属性

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 13

Recommended Articles

Metrics