Abstract:

In civil litigations， the parties’ agreement， the court’s designation and “balloting” operated by the court are the main approaches to select forensic appraisal institutions. Because procedures are designed for certain purpose and value， from the perspective both of practice and value， the anticipated results of the above approaches by the legislature have not been realized for they can not cope with the complicated reality. Integrating the selecting approaches is the most convenient way to solve the present problems in civil litigations.  

Key words: forensic appraisal institution, scientificalness, selecting approach

摘要：

民事诉讼鉴定机构的遴选机制，包括当事人协议确定、人民法院指定以及法院“摇号”确定鉴定机构三种。程序本身天然具有有限的目的和价值选择，无论是在诉讼实务还是诉讼价值上，上述三种遴选程序其立法所预期的结果都被复杂的现实所淹没。整合各遴选机制使其在诉讼中发挥作用，是解决当前民事诉讼中鉴定遴选问题最便捷的方法。

关键词: 鉴定机构  , 科学性  , 遴选程序