›› 2008 ›› Issue (06): 83-86.
• 论文 • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Qiao,ZHAO Feng(Sichuan Zhongheng Institute of Forensic Science,Sichuan 610031,China)
黄乔;赵峰;
Abstract: As with all other forensic conclusions,the forensic accounting conclusion is not naturally granted"finality".It must be reviewed by courts and cross examined by relevant parties to decide its proving power.Cross-examination is the rational procedure to guarantee the fairness of litigation.The paper discusses the techniques of cross-examination of forensic accounting conclusions.
Key words: forensic accounting, forensic conclusion, cross-examination, technique
摘要: 司法会计鉴定结论同所有鉴定结论一样,并不具备天然的"权威性",其证明力如何,须经法院审查和当事人的互相质证,这是一种正当的程序保障,有助于体现诉讼的公正性。本文从技术操作层面分析探讨了司法会计鉴定结论质证的方法。
关键词: 司法会计, 鉴定结论, 质证, 方法
HUANG Qiao;ZHAO Feng(Sichuan Zhongheng Institute of Forensic Science;Sichuan 00;China). Discussion on the Cross-examination of Forensic Accounting Conclusions[J]. , 2008(06): 83-86.
黄乔;赵峰;. 司法会计鉴定结论质证方法探讨[J]. , 2008(06): 83-86.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.chsfjd.cn/EN/
http://www.chsfjd.cn/EN/Y2008/V0/I06/83