主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2023 ›› Issue (6): 8-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2023.06.002

• Special Topic Discussion: Technical Examination of Forensic Appraisal Opinions • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Standardization of Technical Evidence Examination in Procuratorial Organs

XING Ting   

  1. Jiangsu Provincial People’s Procuratorate, Nanjing 210024, China
  • Received:2023-06-10 Published:2023-11-15 Online:2023-11-16

检察机关技术性证据专门审查标准化研究

邢 庭   

  1. 江苏省人民检察院,江苏 南京210024
  • 作者简介:邢庭(1980—),男,硕士,主要从事法医学、证据法学研究。E-mail:xingting99@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    2018年江苏省第五期“333工程”科研资助立项项目(BRA2018305);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金课题(JBKY20200904)。

Abstract: Procuratorial organs carry out specialized examination of technical evidence, which plays an important role in scientific support in actual case handling. With the promulgation of relevant laws, judicial interpretations and technical norms, such as the people’s procuratorates’ rules of procedure, regulations on specialized examination work, professional working rules, and guidelines on specialized examination work, the framework for specialized examination work of procuratorial organs has taken shape. However, the current specialized examination work still has some problems, such as insufficient integration of case handling demand and technology supply, imperfect technical standards for specialized examination and fuzzy positioning of specialized examination opinions. In order to standardize the specialized review of technical evidence such as expert opinions, we should unify the standards of specialized review work, build a standardized review model, increase the application research of specialized review standardization work, and further improve the quality and effectiveness of specialized review of technical evidence.

Key words: technical evidence, review guideline, the standardization of specialized examination

摘要: 检察机关开展技术性证据专门审查工作,在实际办案中发挥着重要的科技支持作用。随着人民检察院诉讼规则、专门审查工作规定、专业工作细则、专门审查工作指引等相关法律、司法解释、技术规范的出台,检察机关专门审查工作架构已经形成。但是,当前专门审查工作尚存在办案需求与技术供给融合效果不够,专门审查技术标准不健全、专门审查意见定位模糊等问题。为规范鉴定意见等技术性证据专门审查工作,应当统一专门审查工作标准,构建审查标准化模式,加大专门审查标准化工作应用研究,进一步提升技术性证据专门审查质效。

关键词: 技术性证据, 审查指引, 专门审查标准化

CLC Number: