主管:中华人民共和国司法部
主办:司法鉴定科学研究院
ISSN 1671-2072  CN 31-1863/N

Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences ›› 2024 ›› Issue (6): 93-99.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2072.2024.06.012

• Forensic Forum • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Dishonesty of Forensic Appraisal Institutions from the Perspective of Two-Layer Credit

ZHANG Zhengchang, LI Peilin   

  1. Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2024-03-18 Published:2024-11-15 Online:2024-11-28

双层信用视角下司法鉴定机构失信问题研究

张正昌,李佩霖   

  1. 中国政法大学 证据科学研究院,北京 100088
  • 作者简介:张正昌(1996—),男,博士研究生,主要从事证据法学研究。E-mail:zwrtg168@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(21A2D062)。

Abstract: Some forensic appraisal institutions commit acts of dishonesty in commercial and judicial services, which have caused damages to the operation of the forensic appraisal market and the credibility of the judiciary. The use of credit tools is a useful way to solve the problem of dishonesty in forensic appraisal institutions. The Law on the Construction of Social Credit System (Draft for Public Comments) regulates the issue of dishonesty from the perspective of two-layer credit of business integrity and judicial credibility, which provides a feasible solution and normative basis for the resolution of the problem of dishonesty in forensic appraisal institutions. In the future, we can take the basic law on credit construction as the core, build a two-layer normative system of business integrity and judicial credibility to enhance the normative supply of regulation of forensic appraisal institutions’ dishonesty, build a unified forensic appraisal management agency, realize the two functions of optimizing market regulation and strengthening law enforcement, and form a synergy between moral and legal levels to regulate forensic appraisal institutions’ dishonest behavior, which will help to solve the problem of dishonesty of forensic appraisal institutions.

Key words: forensic appraisal, credit, dishonesty, Law on the Construction of Social Credit System(Draft for Public Comments)

摘要: 部分司法鉴定机构存在商务失信行为以及司法服务失信行为,对司法鉴定市场运行以及司法公信力造成损害。使用信用工具是化解司法鉴定机构失信问题的有益途径,《社会信用体系建设法(向社会公开征求意见稿)》从商务诚信、司法公信双层信用视角规范失信问题,为司法鉴定机构失信问题的解决提供了可行方案与规范基础。将来可以社会信用建设基本法律为核心,建设商务诚信、司法公信双层规范体系,以增强司法鉴定机构失信规制的规范供给,构建统一司法鉴定管理机构,实现优化市场调节与强化法律实施的两大功能,在道德与法律两个层面形成合力规制司法鉴定机构失信行为,助力解决司法鉴定机构失信问题。

关键词: 司法鉴定, 信用, 失信, 《社会信用体系建设法(向社会公开征求意见稿)》

CLC Number: